The Red Line: How the Debt Ceiling Agreement Traps the Next President — Whoever It Might Be — on His First Day in Office

The Fiscal Responsibility Act that finally resolved the debt ceiling standoff might have solved a crisis in the short term — but it lays a perilous trap for whoever is elected president in 2024. It suspends the ceiling until January 2, 2025, at which time the new ceiling becomes whatever is the then-outstanding amount of national debt.That means we will hit the new ceiling on the very day it is established. And whoever is elected next year will start his term in the middle of a new debt crisis. Just two years after hitting the “old” ceiling last January, we will be right back into another standoff. No president has been in such a predicament in our entire history.The only upside is that the new law could set the terms of debate in the 2024 presidential and congressional elections. It could force the presidential — and, for that matter, congressional — candidates to address what they will do on Inauguration Day in 2025, when the nation will be 18 days into a new suspension of borrowing.The new ceiling is likely to be $35.4 trillion, after a staggering $4 trillion of borrowing in the meantime. The likely federal deficit — and additional borrowing — for this fiscal year ending September 30 is about $2 trillion, having reached a $1.1 trillion deficit at mid-year, according to the March Monthly Treasury Statement.So then deduct the $500 billion already borrowed this fiscal year before we hit the “old” debt ceiling. That’s $1.5 trillion. To that, add another $2.5 trillion of debt to cover deficit spending over the following 15 months through December 2024, and we’re at $35.4 trillion.While the Congressional Budget Office projects just a $1.5 trillion deficit this year, it has not adjusted for weak April tax receipts that were “$250 billion less than the CBO anticipated,” nor has it adjusted for significantly higher interest on the national debt. These are no small matters.As for the Fiscal Responsibility Act, it barely amounts to a speed bump in face of that torrid pace of deficit spending and borrowing. The CBO has scored the FRA as saving only $150 billion annually over a decade. That’s petty cash. Baby steps, even if the steps are theoretically in the right direction.Further cuts may emerge either from the reimposition of the regular appropriation process that the FRA mandates or from the penalty of a 1 percent across-the-board cut in all discretionary spending absent regular process. Even if the penalty works, significant cuts are unlikely. The 1 percent penalty also serves as a maximum on cuts. The FRA does freeze deficit spending. It doesn’t reduce it in any material way, though, not after Mr. Biden and the Democrats fought to protect their wild spending. They don’t understand — or are willfully ignorant of the fact — that deficit spending on the scale currently prevailing will not fund more progressive programs. Rather deficit spending will lead to the elimination of progressive priorities, as interest on the national debt squeezes them out. Net interest on the national debt is the fastest growing item in the federal budget. Soon, it will be the largest item, surpassing Social Security.In fiscal 2021, net interest was $352 billion; in fiscal 2022, $475 billion. In fiscal 2023, it has already reached an annualized pace of $680 billion over the last three months, per Monthly Treasury Statements. Net interest is not even close to its near-term peak.Most of the Federal Reserve’s interest rate hikes have been in effect for less than a year. The embedded interest on our currently outstanding $24.6 trillion of publicly held debt ($31.4 trillion less $6.8 trillion in government trust accounts) is about 2.8 percent ($680 billion divided by $24.6 trillion).That is far below current interest rates of 5.25 percent on short-term Treasury bills and about 3.9 percent on long-term Treasury bonds. Adding another $4 trillion of debt, brings publicly held debt to about $28.6 trillion on January 2, 2025 (just 19 months from now), more than the CBO’s projected GDP. If the embedded interest rate on that $28.6 trillion of debt has risen to just 3.5 percent — still well below current interest rates, the annualized interest cost will be about $1.0 trillion. The CBO, in contrast, projects an increase to an average embedded interest rate of only 2.9 percent and only $745 billion of interest cost for fiscal 2024. The increase in interest cost to between $745 billion to $1 trillion will have to be taken from other spending categories every year, or the new debt ceiling will have to be raised by yet another enormous amount in less than two years. Thus, the debate in the autumn of 2024. Which brings us back to Congress.Speaker McCarthy is to be commended for steering the passage of FRA, including engineering its passage overwhelmingly on Democrat votes. This positions Democrats as supporting only baby steps in restraining the runaway deficit spending that is fueling massive increases in debt and skyrocketing interest costs.And, of course, inflation. So now Congressional Republicans have an opportunity to lead a great national debate about the nation’s unsustainable fiscal path and convince the nation to take the giant steps that are needed.

The Red Line: How the Debt Ceiling Agreement Traps the Next President — Whoever It Might Be — on His First Day in Office

The Red Line: How the Debt Ceiling Agreement Traps the Next President — Whoever It Might Be — on His First Day in Office

More from the New York Sun

Pope Leo Heralds AI Doom Warnings as Trump Courts Tech Titans

‘Digger’ Buries Tom Cruise in Overblown and Underwhelming Climate Change Satire

Could Gavin Newsom Subsidize the Press That President Trump Loves To Hate?

Conference of German States Seeks To Thwart AfD Influence Over Policy

Federal Judge Hands President a Win, Rejects BBC’s Request To Depose Former White House Aide

New York Film Festival Review: ‘Fatherland’ Finds Redemption and Ruin in Post-War Germany

Picture of Persistence: André Kertész’s Long Search for Recognition

Short of Soldiers, Ukraine Is Building a ‘Robot Army’

More from the New York Sun

Pope Leo Heralds AI Doom Warnings as Trump Courts Tech Titans

‘Digger’ Buries Tom Cruise in Overblown and Underwhelming Climate Change Satire

Could Gavin Newsom Subsidize the Press That President Trump Loves To Hate?

Conference of German States Seeks To Thwart AfD Influence Over Policy

Federal Judge Hands President a Win, Rejects BBC’s Request To Depose Former White House Aide

New York Film Festival Review: ‘Fatherland’ Finds Redemption and Ruin in Post-War Germany

Picture of Persistence: André Kertész’s Long Search for Recognition

Short of Soldiers, Ukraine Is Building a ‘Robot Army’