Zelensky Now Has a Card To Play With Trump: Diesel
By JAMES BROOKE
|Loading article…
This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.
Published:
Updated:
We don’t mind saying that we enjoy Linda Greenhouse’s columns on the Supreme Court, and few of them more than her latest warning on Obamacare. She may be several kilo-parsecs* to our left, but her capacity to plough through the briefs is heroical. Her latest column reckons that overturning Obamacare because of the curlicues of statutory phrasing at issue in King v. Burwell would “change the nature of the Supreme Court” itself. This because it would abjure its practice of looking at the whole of a law, etc etc, and resisting the temptation to get caught up in pettifogging.
By JAMES BROOKE
|
By MATTHEW RICE
|
By BRADLEY CORTRIGHT
|
By DANIEL McCARTHY
|
By CONRAD BLACK
|
By WILL FRIEDWALD
|
By MATTHEW RICE
|
By THE NEW YORK SUN
|We don’t mind saying that we enjoy Linda Greenhouse’s columns on the Supreme Court, and few of them more than her latest warning on Obamacare. She may be several kilo-parsecs* to our left, but her capacity to plough through the briefs is heroical. Her latest column reckons that overturning Obamacare because of the curlicues of statutory phrasing at issue in King v. Burwell would “change the nature of the Supreme Court” itself. This because it would abjure its practice of looking at the whole of a law, etc etc, and resisting the temptation to get caught up in pettifogging.
Already have a subscription? Sign in to continue reading
Cancel anytime
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
Cancel anytime