British Minister: Woman Should Lose Job for Refusing To Remove Islamic Veil

This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

The New York Sun

LONDON — A British government minister joined an increasingly bitter debate about the rights of female Muslims to veil their faces, saying a teaching assistant should be fired for insisting on wearing one in school.

The government’s Race and Faith minister, Phil Woolas, was quoted by the Sunday Mirror newspaper as demanding that Aishah Azmi, an Islamic teaching assistant, be fired for refusing to remove her veil at work.

“She should be sacked. She has put herself in a position where she can’t do her job,” Mr. Woolas said.

Ms. Azmi has refused to remove her black veil, which leaves only her eyes visible, in front of male colleagues. She was suspended from her job but has taken her case to an industrial tribunal, a court that handles cases on employment law, which will make a decision in the next few weeks.

Ms. Azmi, who is 24 and has two children, has insisted that she had been willing to remove her veil in class, as long as there were no adult males present.

“She is denying the right of children to a full education by insisting that she wears the veil. If she is saying that she won’t work with men, she is taking away the right of men to work in school,” Mr. Woolas said.

The debate on the veils began earlier this month, when Jack Straw, the former foreign secretary who now serves as leader of the House of Commons, said Islamic women visiting his office should remove their veils.

The opposition Conservatives also weighed in on the contentious issue, with one of the party’s top officials accusing Islamic leaders of encouraging a “voluntary apartheid” that could help spawn homegrown terrorism.

A top Conservative Party official, David Davis, supported Mr. Straw for starting the debate.

“What Jack touched on was the fundamental issue of whether in Britain we are developing a divided society,” Mr. Davis told the Sunday Telegraph newspaper. “Whether we are inadvertently encouraging a kind of voluntary apartheid.”

Prime Minister has praised Mr. Straw for raising the issue “in a measured and considered way” and urged Britons to engage in such discussions without “becoming hysterical.”

Salman Rushdie, whose book “The Satanic Verses” once led to death threats against him by Islamic clerics, said last week that Mr. Straw “was expressing an important opinion, which is that veils suck, which they do. I think the veil is a way of taking power away from women.”

The House of Lords’ first Islamic legislator, Nazir Ahmed, yesterday joined the fray by criticizing British politicians and the press for “demonizing” the country’s community of Muslims.

In an interview with British Broadcasting Corp. radio, Mr. Ahmed said: “Let’s be honest, there are people in our community who call themselves Muslims who have been threatening our national security.”

In Tunisia, the authorities are applying with renewed enthusiasm a law dating back to 1981 that bans women from wearing Islamic headscarves in public places, the British Broadcasting Corp. reported. Those who refuse face losing their jobs.


The New York Sun

© 2025 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used.

The New York Sun

Sign in or  create a free account

or
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use