Jack Smith’s Immunity Woes Could Derail What Trump Calls ‘Extreme and Fanatical’ Mar-a-Lago Prosecution
It’s not only the January 6 case that could be upended by the 45th president’s victory at the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court’s ruling that presidents are presumptively entitled to immunity for all official acts could not only wreck Special Counsel Jack Smith’s January 6 case against President Trump — it could throw into havoc the Mar-a-Lago one too.
Please check your email.
A verification code has been sent to
Didn't get a code? Click to resend.
Have an account? Log In
To continue reading, please select:
Limited Access
Enter your email to read for FREE
Get 1 FREE article
Continue with
or
Unlimited Access
Join the Sun for a PENNY A DAY
$0.01/day for 60 days
Cancel anytime
100% ad free experience
Unlimited article and commenting access
Full annual dues ($120) billed after 60 days
