Justice Thomas Signals That Jack Smith’s Troubles in Trump Prosecution Could Worsen
A concurrence from the court’s senior justice suggests that he is alert to the issues in the challenges to the special counsel’s appointment.
Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurrence in Trump v. United States not only affirmed the majority’s ruling that a former president is “presumptively immune” for official acts. It also ratchets up judicial attention on Special Counsel Jack Smith’s appointment, an issue that hangs in the balance before Judge Aileen Cannon. Is Justice Thomas sending a constitutional bat signal?
Please check your email.
A verification code has been sent to
Didn't get a code? Click to resend.
To continue reading, please select:
Enter your email to read for FREE
Get 1 FREE article
Join the Sun for a PENNY A DAY
$0.01/day for 60 days
Cancel anytime
100% ad free experience
Unlimited article and commenting access
Full annual dues ($120) billed after 60 days
