The <a href="https://youtu.be/-vEE44TNMqE?si=c8OjWeD8PCWz4NxW">release</a> of a new campaign advertisement named “Bombshell” from the Harris-Walz campaign that focuses on Special Counsel Jack Smith’s 165-page immunity brief is likely to amplify President Trump’s contention that the January 6 case doubles as “election interference.”&nbsp;



The 30-second digital ad first is set to run in battleground states beginning on Sunday. That is only 23 days before America decides whether to make the 45th president the 47th one. Trump has called the special counsel’s motion a “monstrosity” and a “false hit job.”&nbsp;



Now, that <a href="https://www.nysun.com/article/judge-releases-damning-excerpts-from-jack-smiths-january-6-case-against-trump-35-days-before-the-election">document</a>, which argues that Trump “must stand trial for his private crimes as would any other citizen,” has fully entered the campaign. The ad flashes press headlines tied to its release last week and features dilated images of its text. Quotations from Mr. Smith’s prose unspool across the screen. Among them is the allegation that Trump, after he was told that Vice President Pence was in danger, declared, “So what?”



The advertisement splices together images of the riot at the Capitol with ominous music and selections from the special counsel’s filing. The words “we knew it was bad” are followed by “but it was worse than we thought.” Mr. Smith’s accusation that Trump “resorted to crimes to stay in office” is featured, as are images of, in succession, Mr. Pence and Senator Vance, with the caption, “Next time, there won’t be anyone to stop” Trump from reversing the election results. The word “Report,” a reference to Mr. Smith’s motion, is cited as the source for Trump “pressuring officials,” “endangering lives,” “spreading lies,” and “encouraging the mob.”&nbsp;



The choice to publish the motion was Judge Tanya Chutkan’s, who was persuaded that a book-length document was the best way for her to fulfill the Supreme Court’s mandate that she determine which of the acts alleged by Mr. Smith were official, and therefore presumptively immune. Unofficial ones, according to Trump v. United States, are bereft of immunity. The special counsel contends that Trump’s effort to overturn the election was a “private one” undertaken in his “private capacity as a candidate for office.”



Trump has argued that publicizing this motion so close to the vote amounts to election interference. His lawyers wrote Judge Chutkan that Mr. Smith aimed for his “politically motivated manifesto to be public, contrary to the Justice Manual and longstanding DOJ norms in cases not involving President Trump, in the final weeks of the 2024 Presidential election.”&nbsp;



Department of Justice regulations ordain that federal prosecutors “may never select the timing of investigative steps or criminal charges for the purpose of affecting any election, or for the purpose of giving an advantage or disadvantage to any candidate or political party.” Mr. Smith’s new and slimmed-down indictment was docketed 70 days before November 5, clearing by 10 days another DOJ rule that charges not be handed up 60 days before an election.



Judge Chutkan writes that she “need not address the substance” of Trump’s claims of election interference because “concern with the political consequences of these proceedings does not bear on the pretrial schedule.” Trump notes on Truth Social that he has “been informed by my attorneys, that you’re not even allowed to bring cases literally right before an Election.”



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" srcset="https://wp.nysun.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/jacksmith1-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https://wp.nysun.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/jacksmith1-300x200.jpg 300w, https://wp.nysun.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/jacksmith1-144x96.jpg 144w, https://wp.nysun.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/jacksmith1-768x512.jpg 768w, https://wp.nysun.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/jacksmith1-1536x1024.jpg 1536w, https://wp.nysun.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/jacksmith1-2048x1365.jpg 2048w" class="wp-image-223716" alt="Special Counsel Jack Smith delivers remarks on August 1, 2023 at Washington, DC." src="https://wp.nysun.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/jacksmith1-1024x683.jpg" height="683" width="1024" loading="lazy" decoding="async"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Special Counsel Jack Smith on August 1, 2023, at Washington, D.C. Drew Angerer/Getty Images</figcaption></figure>



The judge, in oral arguments, has acknowledged that Mr. Smith’s filing, which clocks in at quadruple the maximum length customarily allotted, is “procedurally irregular” because it does not follow a defense motion. She noted that judges “routinely depart” from the customary litigation script.&nbsp;



One of Trump’s attorneys, John Lauro, responded that the course Judge Chutkan chose is “enormously prejudicial to President Trump. I can’t imagine a more unfair protocol.” He added that the immunity opus is a “device that turns the criminal rules on its head. There are no special rules for the special counsel.”



Mr. Lauro and the rest of Trump’s legal team have invoked the Sixth Amendment to press their case that Judge Chutkan’s decision to release the motion in advance of trial harms not only Trump’s political prospects, but also his constitutional rights. That clause of the parchment mandates in part that “in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to … an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed.”



Trump’s reply to Mr. Smith’s motion is likely to argue that its release to the public — and translation into a campaign advertisement — is prejudicial to his interests in both the jury box and the ballot one. Any judgment that Judge Chutkan hands down on admissible evidence can be appealed to the riders of the District of Columbia Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals — and possibly to the Supreme Court.&nbsp;



While the justices will not be able to seal what Judge Cannon has unsealed, they could again upend Mr. Smith’s case by ruling that it is founded on immunized evidence.

'Bombshell,' an advertisement from the Harris-Walz campaign.

Kamala Harris Uses Jack Smith’s Words in Anti-Trump Ad: Does This Strengthen Trump’s Claim of ‘Election Interference’?

A new advertisement for the vice president puts the special counsel’s report front and center less than a month before the vote.

Kamala Harris Uses Jack Smith’s Words in Anti-Trump Ad: Does This Strengthen Trump’s Claim of ‘Election Interference’? | The New York Sun

Home

The New York Sun

https://wp.nysun.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/the-new-york-sun-og.jpg

For more than an hour on 'The View' on May 8, President Biden defended his record and his decision to run for re-election. 

Biden, Dreading Tell-Alls on His Faculties, Reaches for an Outdated Playbook

Shipping containers at the Guangzhou Port in China.

United States, China Begin Second Day of Trade Talks at Geneva

Morgan C. Jones as James Joyce in 'The United States vs. Ulysses.'

James Joyce’s ‘Ulysses’ Is on Trial Once More — in a New Play About the 20th Century’s Greatest Novel

(L-R) Brigham Buhler, Jillian Michael and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Big Pharma Is Winning the Price War Over Weight Loss Drugs Like Ozempic: Will RFK Jr. and His MAHA Allies Push Back? 

Sean 'Diddy' Combs, right, turns around and looks at the audience during jury selection at Manhattan federal court, Monday, May 5, 2025, in New York. 

‘There Was Mutual Violence in Their Relationship’: Defense in Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs Trial Will Claim Ex-Girlfriend Cassie Was an Aggressor, as Opening Arguments Begin

Jen Psaki's new primetime show debuted Tuesday on MSNBC.

Embarrassment for MSNBC as Former Biden Aide Jen Psaki’s New Show Tanks in the Ratings After Only Two Nights

Body of American Journalist Austin Tice Reportedly Found in Syria

Axial Seamount, an undersea volcano that lies along two tectonic plates off the coast of Oregon, last erupted in April 2015. 

Kamala Harris Uses Jack Smith’s Words in Anti-Trump Ad: Does This Strengthen Trump’s Claim of ‘Election Interference’?

To continue reading, please select:

Enter your email to read for FREE

Join the Sun for a PENNY A DAY

Sections

More

Sign in or create a free account

A login link has been sent to