The resignation of David Malpass as president of the World Bank will put a spring in the step of those favoring a liberal, free-market path out of our financial crisis. It was announced Wednesday that he will leave, in line with Bank tradition, at the end of the fiscal year in June. He was the best World Bank president to date. The non-partisan role of the bank, though, made it inapt for him to enter the political fight for fiscal and monetary reform at home. Now he can re-enter the fray.

Call it “Mission Possible.” That’s a play on the headline — “Mission Impossible” — that the Wall Street Journal put on its savvy editorial after President Trump appointed Mr. Malpass to the World Bank post. The Journal’s point was that it wasn’t going to be possible due to the nature of the World Bank’s ideology and organizational structure to advance the strategies of liberty and growth of which the bank ought to be a paragon. 

The quest we’re rooting for Mr. Malpass to help lead — for the end of the age of fiat money and the start of a new age of economic liberty — is not only possible but imperative. So he’s liberated at an ideal time. President Biden and the Democrats have given us inflation. It has fed an illusion of full employment — paid for with unsustainable spending and borrowing, including the scandal of trillions from its own central bank.  

We don’t speak for Mr. Malpass. How he might pursue these goals, we will see. Yet we have been covering this drama two generations, and our own view is that Mr. Malpass — brilliant, strategic, and honest — is made for this fight. Mr. Trump chose him to lead the World Bank in no small part because of the clarity of his economic vision, expressed in writings in the Wall Street Journal, among other places (including our own columns).

Neither do we want to overlook his achievements at the World Bank. He oversaw a dramatic reduction in funding directed to Communist China, which had been in the habit of availing itself of billions in loans from the bank. He found important allies in the developing world as well as the developed world for better policies at the bank. These have included India, Italy, and Japan. He has found friends of liberty in the poorest lands.

Nor do we want to underestimate the challenges ahead. Treasury Secretary Yellen did issue a gracious statement noting Mr. Malpass’s accomplishments. Yet in the past year or so a number of left-wing ideologues close to the administration has been disparaging Mr. Malpass. They’ve included Vice President Gore and Secretary Kerry, who have been, in our view, particularly nasty and wrong. Mr. Malpass remained a happy warrior, eschewing their tactics, and building allies in and out of the bank. 

He kept the bank on a sure financial footing through a pandemic, energy crisis, and the war in Ukraine. And has kept his head in the climate debate, even while Secretary Yellen and others have been pressing the bank to take, as Ms. Yellen put it last week, “bolder and more imaginative” steps to proffer funds for climate change. She called for changes to the bank’s “vision, incentives, operating model, and financial capacity.” 

This is a moment to remember an insight that the world learned when the Iron Curtain came down and the spirit of capitalism stirred, if only somewhat, in the communist world. The worst system for the environment and climate is communism. We learned that in Russia and China. The best system is capitalism, limited government, the rule of law, and the moral rock of the legal protection of property rights. Few get this better than Mr. Malpass. Welcome home.

_________

This editorial was revised from the bulldog and updated to note Secretary Yellen’s statement.