Democrats’ Lynch-Law Justice Comes for Accused Cornell Fraternity Men
By BETSY McCAUGHEY
|Loading article…
The protections would ‘functionally rewrite Title IX in a way that shockingly transforms American education and usurps a major question from Congress,’ the judge says.
Published:
Updated:
The Biden administration has gone a step too far in its broad interpretation of Title IX protections, a federal judge has ruled, asserting that protections barring discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity are unlawful and merely “advance an agenda.”
By BETSY McCAUGHEY
|
By THE NEW YORK SUN
|
By THE NEW YORK SUN
|
By DAVID MASTIO
|
By JAMES BROOKE
|
By JENNIFER DOHERTY
|
By LAWRENCE KUDLOW
|
By LUKE FUNK
|The Biden administration has gone a step too far in its broad interpretation of Title IX protections, a federal judge has ruled, asserting that protections barring discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity are unlawful and merely “advance an agenda.”
Already have a subscription? Sign in to continue reading
Cancel anytime
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
Cancel anytime