‘Unacceptable Risk’ of Mamdani Mayoralty Looms as Assurances of Curbs on Hizzoner’s Powers Likely To Ring Hollow 

Legal guardrails against, say, raising taxes and spending are mere tissue paper under New York’s one-party, increasingly leftist rule.

Yuki Iwamura-Pool/Getty Images
Zohran Mamdani during the New York City Democratic Mayoral Primary Debate at NBC Studios on June 4, 2025. Yuki Iwamura-Pool/Getty Images

A Florida trade group is using what it calls “the unacceptable risk” of a Zohran Mamdani mayoralty to entice Big Apple chief executives into moving their firms and families to the Sunshine State.

Smart marketing: Business leaders are already doing the Mamdani math — adding up the mammoth costs of his promised public spending on universal child care, transportation and other freebies.

A Mayor Mamdani would either raise New York’s already high taxes to pay for all these goodies, or his reckless spending will plunge the city into fiscal chaos, leading to draconian austerity measures like cuts to police and garbage collection.

Disastrous either way.

Aren’t there legal guardrails to limit what an irresponsible New York City mayor — even a crazed socialist one — can do?

For half a century, ever since Gotham’s financial debacle in 1975, New Yorkers have taken comfort in knowing that a state-run financial control board is in place to prevent the city from ever again plunging into financial chaos.

Yet that’s more a myth than a reality: The guardrails have turned into tissue paper under New York’s one-party, increasingly leftist rule.

In 1975, overspending and an economic slump put New York City on the brink of bankruptcy. Banks would no longer underwrite the city’s debt.

The state stepped in, creating the seven-member New York State Financial Control Board — made up of the NYC mayor, the governor, the state and city comptrollers, and three additional members chosen by the governor — to right the ship.

Until 1986, this powerful board controlled the city’s budget, union contracts and borrowing, no matter who occupied City Hall.

Since then, the FCB has been in hibernation but legally poised to reactivate if the city spends more than it takes in, or fails to pay its debts — likely scenarios under a Mayor Mamdani.

Here’s the hitch: Reactivating the FCB requires the consent of the state legislature.

Good luck with that.

The state senate majority leader, Andrea Stewart-Cousins, and her powerful No. 2, Senator Michael Gianaris, both Democrats, have allied with the hard left for years. Both now endorse Mr. Mamdani.

Don’t count on them to defy Mr. Mamdani and put the city’s financial management in safer hands. Few Democratic pols in the state are showing the backbone to speak a word against Mr. Mamdani even now, before he’s actually been elected.

And don’t expect the City Council, almost entirely dominated by leftists, to resist Mr. Mamdani’s excessive spending.

Last month the Council pushed Mayor Adams to accept a record-setting $116 billion budget, bloated with new services for illegal immigrants and a pilot program for universal child care starting at birth.

Is there a firewall against the huge tax hikes required to fund Mr. Mamdani’s utopian wish list? Depends on what type of taxes.

Mr. Mamdani says he plans to raise the city’s corporate tax rate to 11.5 percent to bring in $5 billion. He also wants to slap an additional 2 percent on the income tax rate paid by individuals earning more than $1 million a year, collecting another $4 billion.

Only the state legislature can impose those tax increases, and Governor Hochul says she won’t sign any such hikes into law — a vow that’s likely good until the next statewide election, in November 2026.

After that, New Yorkers could be in big trouble if a solidly blue state government approves new taxes to fund Mamdani’s wild ideas.

Property taxes are another matter and a looming threat. Get ready to pay up big time, whether or not you own your home.

A socialist mayor will go where the money is. Real estate taxes brought in $37 billion last year, nearly half of all city revenues — and the mayor and City Council largely control property tax levies.

New York City is exempt from the property tax cap imposed on most parts of the state. For Gothamites, state law only puts a lid on annual increases in assessed real estate values, limiting them to 6 percent a year for large properties and 8 percent for smaller ones.

That’s not enough protection against a cash-hungry spendaholic mayor.

Property tax hikes impact not only building owners but residents of co-ops and condos — and many renters too, when landlords pass the tax increase along.

So much for Mr. Mamdani’s “affordability” blather.

Here’s the clincher: Mr. Mamdani is promising to increase assessments in what he calls “richer and whiter” neighborhoods, claiming property valuations there haven’t kept up with the rising real estate market.

If you live in Manhattan or Brooklyn, get ready to be socked with higher taxes — and possibly see your home’s resale value drop as a result.

In a one-party city and a nearly one-party state, there are few safeguards against the maniacal vision of Mr. Mamdani.

We have just one defense: electing someone else.

Creators.com


The New York Sun

© 2025 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used.

The New York Sun

Sign in or  create a free account

or
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use