With ‘Blazing Saddles’ Turning 50, It’s Worth Considering How Mel Brooks’s Farce Has Fared Through Changing Times

Not only has the picture been accused of racist intent, it’s also been deemed ‘woke’ and a paragon of postmodernism. Regardless, one thing is certain: ‘Blazing Saddles’ isn’t a racist movie.

AP/Nick Ut, file
Mel Brooks poses next to a framed poster advertising his 1974 film 'Blazing Saddles,' at Los Angeles, July 23, 1991. AP/Nick Ut, file

The story of why Richard Pryor didn’t play the role of Black Bart in “Blazing Saddles” (1974) has been rendered shopworn through many retellings, but it bears mentioning on the occasion of the film’s 50th anniversary. Notwithstanding his role as a scriptwriter for the film, Pryor was deemed by Warner Brothers as too volatile a risk: His drug use and erratic behavior made him uninsurable. Director Mel Brooks begged the front office for Pryor’s inclusion, but to no avail: A stage and television actor, Cleavon Little, took on the role.

Have an account? Log In

To continue reading, please select:

Limited Access

Enter your email to read for FREE

Get 1 FREE article

Continue with
or
Unlimited Access

Join the Sun for a PENNY A DAY

$0.01/day for 60 days

Cancel anytime

100% ad free experience

Unlimited article and commenting access

Full annual dues ($120) billed after 60 days

By continuing you agree to our
Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
Advertisement
The New York Sun

© 2025 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used.

The New York Sun

Sign in or  Create a free account

or
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use