‘Guilty Until Proven Innocent’ Defines the Left’s Ploy To Keep Trump Off the Ballot by Using the 14th Amendment

Innocent until proven guilty. That’s a fundamental right in America, at least until now.Anti-Trump groups determined to disqualify the leading Republican candidate for president are urging state election officials across the US to remove Donald Trump from the ballot, claiming he’s an “insurrectionist.” They’re citing an arcane clause in the 14th Amendment, written after the Civil War, that disqualified anyone who “engaged in insurrection against the United States” from holding public office.Here’s the hitch. Mr. Trump has never been convicted of insurrection, and none of his prosecutors — not Jack Smith nor Fani Willis — is charging him with insurrection. The House of Representatives impeached him, accusing him of insurrection, but he was acquitted. So, 0 convictions, 1 acquittal. Even so, a left-wing group, Free Speech for People has sent letters to state election officials , including the co-chairs of the New York State Board of Elections, labeling Mr. Trump an insurrectionist and telling these officials they have a duty to remove Mr. Trump from the ballot, just as they would be obligated to remove any presidential aspirant who had not reached the age of 35 or was not a natural born citizen.Under this scheme, if Mr. Trump wants to be on the ballot, he’ll have to go to court and prove his innocence.In short, guilty until proven innocent. That’s as un-American as it gets. Whether you like Mr. Trump or loathe him, you should be concerned.A George Washington University law professor, Jonathan Turley, calls it “the single most dangerous constitutional theory I’ve seen in decades.”The ploy could also produce chaos in November and December, as states preparing for the upcoming presidential primaries deal with lawsuits over Mr. Trump’s presence on the ballot. New Hampshire’s secretary of state and attorney general issued a joint statement last week saying they are “carefully reviewing the legal issues involved.”Ultimately, any attempt to remove Mr. Trump from the ballot would rocket up to the Supreme Court.Free Speech for People’s president, John Bonifaz, has worked closely with Congressman Jamie Raskin, a Maryland Democrat, the lead impeachment manager in Trump’s second impeachment trial in 2021. Mr. Raskin and Democrats failed to convict Trump then. Resorting to the “insurrection clause” is a ploy to get what they failed to achieve constitutionally.Anti-Trumpers on the right are also willing to label Mr. Trump an “insurrectionist” without legal proof and deem him disqualified. Governor Hutchinson said as much on the Republican debate stage in Milwaukee on August 23.The “insurrection clause” was added to the Constitution during Reconstruction, right after the Civil War, to disqualify Confederate office holders and military leaders. But the clause became a dead letter when Chief Justice Chase, who rode circuit and decided appeals court cases as well, ruled in 1869 in a dispute known as In re Griffin, that Section 3 by itself could not disqualify anyone from office. Chase’s ruling remains federal precedent.Free Speech for People and other anti-Trumpers point to a forthcoming University of Pennsylvania Law Review article arguing the Chief Justice’s ruling was wrong. A Harvard Law emeritus professor, Laurence Tribe, also calls Chase’s opinion “poorly reasoned.” That’s the ivory tower crowd’s take. It doesn’t change precedent.In 1918, Socialist Eugene V. Debs went to prison, convicted of inciting US Army personnel to resist authority. But he was not convicted of insurrection. The Socialist Party nominated him for president in 1920, and his name appeared on the ballot in 40 states. Justice for Debs but not for the 45th President?Last spring, Free Speech for People tried to get Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene removed from the ballot in Georgia using the insurrection clause. But Judge Charles Beaudrot ruled there was insufficient evidence she had engaged in insurrection. “Heated political rhetoric. Yes,” the judge said. “ A call to arms for consummation of a pre-planned violent revolution? No.”Thank you for the sane perspective, Judge Beaudrot. January 6th was unfortunate. Yet the Civil War cost 750,000 American lives. Fortunately, nothing like that has severed this nation since.The ploy to take Trump off the ballot is profoundly anti-democratic. Tell anti-Trumpers in both parties to woo voters with winning policies instead.Due process and the presumption of innocence—even for Trump — are principles that make our nation exceptional.Respect America.___________Correction: The Republican debate at Milwaukee took place on August 23. An earlier version misstated the date.

‘Guilty Until Proven Innocent’ Defines the Left’s Ploy To Keep Trump Off the Ballot by Using the 14th Amendment

More from the New York Sun

Can America End Tehran’s Nuclear Aspirations Without Boots on the Ground?

CBS News Reporter Who Denounced MAGA ‘Lies’ About 2020 Election Quits Over Network’s Balanced January 6 Coverage: Report

Democrats To Introduce Legislation Explicitly Banning Prediction Markets Related to War and Death

More from the New York Sun

Can America End Tehran’s Nuclear Aspirations Without Boots on the Ground?

CBS News Reporter Who Denounced MAGA ‘Lies’ About 2020 Election Quits Over Network’s Balanced January 6 Coverage: Report

Democrats To Introduce Legislation Explicitly Banning Prediction Markets Related to War and Death

‘CNN Is Not a Serious Organization’: Embattled Network Denounced for Sympathetic Coverage of ISIS Terror Suspects

‘Say Nothing’: Gerry Adams, Alleged IRA Commander, Dons Bulletproof Vest, Denies Ordering Bombings That Shook Britain

Apple News Makes Tiny Increase in Conservative Publications Featured on Top Stories List After Pressure from Trump Administration

American Missiles Pulled From South Korea To Buttress Campaign Against Iran

Extracting Enchantment From the Austen and Brontë Production Industries