Warming Versus Reality

This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

The New York Sun

Reality keeps getting in the way of those who would like to use the threat of global warming to put an end to the age of fossil fuels. Ten days ago a federal judge in New Jersey dismissed a lawsuit by eight states, including California, New York, New Jersey and Wisconsin, demanding that power producers be subjected to caps on emissions of carbon dioxide. They had tried to argue that excess CO2 from power plants is causing climate changes that potentially harm their citizens.


The judge, Loretta Preska, wisely didn’t take a position on global warming. She merely pointed out that she lacked the constitutional authority to decide policy questions. It’s up to the legislative and executive branches of government to decide whether global warming is indeed a threat to humanity, and, if so, what to do about it. Alas for global warming enthusiasts, however, there appears to be little appetite in Washington for doing so.


Former Vice President Al Gore’s masterwork, the 1997 Kyoto agreement calling for a rollback of CO2 emissions to pre-1990 levels, remains a dead letter in the U.S. Senate. Though Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., last week added his voice to the call for legislation to regulate CO2 emissions, there is growing recognition in Washington and beyond that such regulations would yield little benefit while costing stupendous amounts.


At an unofficial “summit” sponsored by Bill Clinton two weeks ago to discuss global issues, Britain’s Prime Minister Tony Blair, once a wholehearted supporter of the Kyoto treaty, conceded that his thinking has changed somewhat. “The truth is that no country is going to cut its growth or consumption in the light of a long-term environmental problem,” he was quoted by Greenwire, an environmental news service, as telling the audience.


Blair appears to be coming around to President George Bush’s insistence that the best way of dealing with such is to subsidize the development of new energy technologies, such as hydrogen. But an even better strategy is to leave new technology to the marketplace – and to focus on adapting to changes as they actually materialize, rather than chasing every phantom risk suggested by alarmists.


For example, remove barriers to the development of genetically engineered crops that can better withstand the slight increase in temperatures that are predicted. If oil is indeed running out, let prices rise, thus discouraging consumption and encouraging new technologies, rather than demanding price controls (as many opportunistic politicians are now doing in the face of the spike in gasoline prices). And stop subsidizing flood insurance that encourages settlement in low-lying areas like New Orleans – or at least build better levees.


The Los Angeles Times recently reported that an environmental lawsuit in the 1970s had succeeded in killing a Corps of Engineers plan to greatly strengthen the storm surge barriers on Lake Pontchartrain and eastern New Orleans – exactly the sites of the catastrophic flooding in that city, killing 1,000 or so citizens.


The specter of global warming makes a particularly handy club with which the anti-automobile set can bash Detroit. But one of the lessons of Katrina was that those who owned automobiles by and large escaped the storm’s worst fury. The evacuation of the Texas coast by car and bus allowed even more to escape Rita.


The automobile is a lifesaver, not just a convenience. It is also a key component of the nation’s prosperity. The most important element of a strategy of adaptation is to make sure that society has the wealth to deal with threats as they arise. What country besides “auto-dependent” America has the wealth to even think about rebuilding a city like New Orleans?



Mr. Bray is a Detroit News columnist.


The New York Sun

© 2025 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used.

The New York Sun

Sign in or  Create a free account

or
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use