Libby Seeks Dismissal Of Charges, Says Special Prosecutor Lacked Authority

This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

The New York Sun


WASHINGTON (AP) – Lawyers for Vice President Cheney’s former top aide asked a federal judge Thursday to dismiss his indictment because the special prosecutor in the CIA leak case lacked authority to bring the charges.


In a court filing, lawyers for I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby said his indictment violates the Constitution because Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald was not appointed by the president with the consent of the Senate.


The defense attorneys also said Fitzgerald’s appointment violates federal law because his investigation was not supervised by the attorney general. They said only Congress can approve such an arrangement.


“Those constitutional and statutory provisions have been violated in this case,” Libby’s lawyers wrote.


Fitzgerald was appointed in December 2003 after former Attorney General John Ashcroft recused himself from the investigation because of his close relationships with White House officials. Then-Deputy Attorney General James Comey, acting in Ashcroft’s place in the matter, selected Fitzgerald.


Comey gave Fitzgerald sweeping power to conduct the investigation into the leak of CIA operative Valerie Plame’s identity, exempting the special counsel from following rules that apply to all U.S. attorneys throughout the nation.


Unlike every other federal prosecutor, Fitzgerald did not have to seek approval from senior Justice Department officials to grant immunity or subpoena reporters and news organizations. Nor did he have to advise senior Justice officials before he sought Libby’s indictment.


“The attorney general may delegate powers but he may not abdicate responsibility,” Libby’s lawyers wrote.


Libby, 55, who resigned as Cheney’s chief of staff after he was indicted, is charged with lying about how he learned Plame’s identity and when he subsequently told reporters. He faces five counts of perjury, false statements and obstruction of justice.


Plame’s identity as a CIA operative was published in July 2003 by columnist Robert Novak after her husband, former U.S. Ambassador Joseph Wilson, accused the administration of twisting intelligence about Iraq’s efforts to buy uranium “yellowcake” in Niger. The year before, the CIA had sent Wilson to Niger to determine the accuracy of the uranium reports.


Libby’s lawyers warned U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton that he may need to require the Justice Department to turn over records _ including a secret letter from Comey to Fitzgerald _ to determine whether the special counsel’s appointment is legal.


Defense attorneys and Fitzgerald will appear in U.S. District Court Friday to argue over defense requests for classified records and evidence gathered by the prosecution about reporters who learned about Plame from government officials other than Libby.


Libby’s trial is set for January 2007.


If the case goes to trial, defense attorneys have signaled that Libby likely will testify that he was so busy with national security issues that he forgot or incorrectly recalled conversations he had with reporters about “less important topics,” such as Plame.


The New York Sun

© 2025 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used.

The New York Sun

Sign in or  Create a free account

or
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use