The Exports That Lift Us

This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

The New York Sun

Consider it a good omen. In October, America’s trade deficit dropped unexpectedly to $58.9 billion, about $5.4 billion less than in September. Although the largest cause was lower oil prices, strong American exports — up 14% from a year earlier — also contributed significantly. And that’s exactly what the economy needs in 2007: an export surge. It would ward off recession and narrow today’s dangerously large global trade imbalances. We need what economists call a “rebalancing” of our economy and the world’s.

With unemployment at 4.5%, America’s economy is hardly ailing. But three threats cloud the outlook.

First, the real estate bust. Speculation helped fuel the boom — and now it’s payback time. In the past year, housing starts have dropped 27% and sales of new homes 25%. With buyers waiting to see how low prices go, inventories of unsold new homes have risen 14%. Some economists see recession. Falling home prices could weaken consumer confidence and spending. By year-end 2007, unemployment will hit 6.3%, predicts Dean Baker of the Center for Economic and Policy Research.

Second, turmoil in the auto industry. Unpopular models, steep gas prices, and high labor costs have forced huge cutbacks at Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler. Pressures could intensify. Vehicle sales will decrease to 16.1 million units in 2007 — the lowest since 1998 — forecasts Moody’s Economy.com. That would be down from 16.5 million in 2006 and almost 17 million in 2005. Since June, manufacturing jobs have dropped by 95,000. About 90% of the loss relates to autos and home building, e.g., lumber and furniture.

Finally, and most importantly, skewed trade. America has gorged on imports while other countries have become overly dependent on exports. In 2006, America will run a current account deficit of $878 billion, estimates the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Meanwhile, China, Japan, and Germany will record surpluses of $211 billion, $165 billion, and $117 billion, respectively. These huge imbalances could destabilize the world economy through a currency crisis or trade slump.

Although most economists think the Federal Reserve will engineer a “soft landing” — nudging inflation down while avoiding a recession — it may be a close call. The real question is whether the world moves toward a sturdier pattern of economic growth: stronger exports for America, stronger consumer spending elsewhere. The present pattern looks increasingly shaky because it involves a perilous contradiction — other countries like selling to America, but they may choke on the resulting flood tide of dollars.

Until now, foreigners have reinvested most dollars in America. In the year ending in September, they bought about $1 trillion of American stocks and government and corporate bonds, says David Wyss of Standard & Poor’s. Private investors — not governments — made 85% of those purchases, he says. But if the preference for dollar investments subsides, America’s stock and bond markets could weaken. The dollar might drop sharply against other currencies. The American economy could suffer from a loss of wealth and confidence, and foreign economies could suffer from a loss of exports.

That’s the danger of today’s trade patterns. In time, these will change. Even without India and China, developing countries are growing at about 5% annually. They will buy more machinery, aircraft, and advanced instruments — the heart of American exports. With growing middle classes, these countries will also probably focus more on their own consumers in the future, and dependence on exports to America will decline. In 2000, developing countries had a total of 352 million people in households with incomes over $16,000, the World Bank estimates. By 2030, that’s projected at 2.1 billion.

But next year is more iffy. Japan and China still seem wedded to export-led growth. A brighter spot is Europe, where domestic growth is accelerating. From 2001 to 2005, annual growth in the euro zone — the 12 countries using the euro — averaged only 1.4%. Now the OECD forecasts 2.2% in 2007 after 2.6% in 2006 — and that might go higher. “In Germany,” says the OECD’s chief economist, Jean-Philippe Cotis, “people were scared to death about unemployment.” If a falling jobless rate quiets their fears, they may spend more. That would be good news if it helps shrink those yawning trade imbalances.


The New York Sun

© 2025 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used.

The New York Sun

Sign in or  Create a free account

or
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use