Prosecutor Raises Anticipation in Peach State Trump Probe

ATLANTA — President Trump and his allies have been put on notice by a prosecutor, but the warning didn’t come from anyone at the Justice Department.It was from a Georgia prosecutor who indicated she was likely to seek criminal charges soon in a two-year election subversion probe. In trying to block the release of a special grand jury’s report, the Fulton County district attorney, Fani Willis, argued in court last week that decisions in the case were “imminent” and that the report’s publication could jeopardize the rights of “future defendants.”Though Ms. Willis, a Democrat, didn’t mention Mr. Trump by name, her comments marked the first time a prosecutor in any of several current investigations tied to the Republican former president has hinted that charges could be forthcoming. The remarks ratcheted anticipation that an investigation focused, in part, on Mr. Trump’s call with Georgia’s secretary of state could conclude before ongoing federal probes.“I expect to see indictments in Fulton County before I see any federal indictments,” said a Georgia State University law professor, Clark Cunningham.Besides the Georgia inquiry, a Justice Department special counsel is investigating Mr. Trump over his role in working with allies to overturn his loss in the 2020 presidential election and his alleged mishandling of classified documents.Mr. Trump had appeared to face the most pressing legal jeopardy from the probe into a cache of classified materials at his Florida resort, and that threat remains. That case seems complicated, at least politically, by the recent discovery of classified records at President Biden’s Delaware home and at a Washington office. The Justice Department tapped a separate special counsel to investigate that matter.Ms. Willis opened her office’s investigation shortly after the release of a recording of a January 2, 2021, phone call between Mr. Trump and Georgia’s secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger. In that conversation, the then-president suggested that Mr. Raffensperger, a fellow Republican, could “find” the votes needed to overturn Trump’s narrow election loss in the state to Biden, a Democrat.“All I want to do is this: I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have,” Mr. Trump said on the call.Since then, the investigation’s scope has broadened considerably, encompassing among other things: a slate of Republican fake electors, phone calls by Mr. Trump and others to Georgia officials in the weeks after the 2020 election, and unfounded allegations of widespread election fraud made to state lawmakers.In an interview, Mr. Trump insisted he did “absolutely nothing wrong” and that his phone call with Raffensperger was “perfect.” He said he felt “very confident” that he would not be indicted.“She’s supposed to be stopping violent crime, and that’s her job,” Mr. Trump said of Ms. Willis. “Not to go after people for political reasons, that did things absolutely perfectly.”It is unclear how Ms. Willis’ case will impact the Justice Department’s probes or what contact her team has had with federal investigators. Justice Department prosecutors have been circumspect in discussing their investigations, offering little insight into how or when they might end.Yet Willis’ comments indicate that the Georgia investigation is on a path toward resolution — with charges or not — on a timetable independent of what the Justice Department is planning to do, legal experts said.Mr. Cunningham, the Georgia State professor, said that Ms. Willis’ comments implied that the special grand jury’s report contained detail about people who the panel and Wills believe should, at minimum, be further investigated.“She wouldn’t be talking about the release of the report creating prejudice to potential future defendants unless she saw in the report peoples’ names who she saw as potential future defendants,” he added.Public disclosures about Ms. Willis’ case are the result, to some degree, of the unusual nature of the Georgia proceedings.Ms. Willis in January of last year sought to convene a special grand jury to help her investigation, citing the need for its subpoena power to compel the testimony of witnesses who otherwise wouldn’t talk to her. She said in a letter to Fulton County’s chief judge that her office had received information indicating a “reasonable probability” that the 2020 election in Georgia “was subject to possible criminal disruptions.”The county’s superior court judges voted to grant the request, and the panel was seated in May. The grand jurors heard from 75 witnesses and reviewed evidence collected by prosecutors and investigators. Among the witnesses who testified were the former New York mayor and Trump lawyer Rudolph “Rudy” Giuliani, Senator Graham of South Carolina, and Georgia state officials like Mr. Raffensperger and Governor Kemp.The panel lacked the authority to issue an indictment, but its report is presumed to include recommendations for further action, possibly including potential criminal charges.The special grand jury was dissolved earlier this month after wrapping up its work and finalizing a report on its investigation. The grand jurors recommended the report be made public.News organizations, including the Associated Press, argued for the report to be released. At a hearing last week, Ms. Willis said that a decision was looming on whether to seek an indictment and that she opposed releasing the report because she wanted to ensure “that everyone is treated fairly and we think for future defendants to be treated fairly, it is not appropriate at this time to have this report released.”Lawyers for witnesses and others identified as targets have insisted that Ms. Willis is driven by politics rather than by legitimate concerns that crimes were committed. Among other things, they pointed to her public statements and initial willingness to speak to print and television news outlets.A Republican who served as district attorney in neighboring Gwinnett County for nearly three decades, Danny Porter, said Ms. Willis has been navigating unfamiliar territory. Special grand juries are relatively rare in Georgia, and the law doesn’t provide much guidance for prosecutors, he said.Even so, Mr. Porter said, it appeared Ms. Willis had not crossed any ethical or legal red lines that would call into question the integrity of the investigation.“Procedurally,” he said, “I haven’t seen anything that made me go, ‘Oh, jeez, I wouldn’t have done that.’”

Prosecutor Raises Anticipation in Peach State Trump Probe

More from the New York Sun

‘Schmigadoon!’ Gleefully Sends Up Broadway Classics, but Soon Runs Out of Gas

Can GOP Conservatives Block Elizabeth Warren?

Banking, Blockading, and the Final Iranian Financial Squeeze

Judge Spares Suspect in Bizarre Plot To Kidnap a North Korean Diplomat From Extradition to Spain

Angry Anti-Trump Journalists Urge White House Correspondents Group To ‘Demonstrate Opposition’ to Trump at Dinner

House Republicans Demand Answers Over Mysterious Deaths, Disappearances of High-Level American Scientists

UN Peacekeeping: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Exclusive: Trump Mounts New Push To Move Appeal of Stormy Daniels Case to Less Hostile Federal Court