
Bill Irwin Serves Up a Comic Master Class in ‘The Imaginary Invalid’
By ELYSA GARDNER
|This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

Published:
Updated:
What is it about Texas, anyhow? That is the question that catches our attention in the Supreme Court’s decision vindicating the Lone Star State on redistricting. The Nine overruled a lower court that had found that the legislature that promulgated new electoral maps was tainted by an “intent” to discriminate against Latinos. Yet for such a finding, the Justices decided (by a vote of five to four), the lower courts failed to meet the burden of proof. That’s a serious failure.

By ELYSA GARDNER
|
By ALEXANDER LARMAN
|
By THE NEW YORK SUN
|
By BRADLEY CORTRIGHT
|
By LAWRENCE KUDLOW
|
By THE NEW YORK SUN
|
By MATTHEW RICE
|
By LUKE FUNK
|What is it about Texas, anyhow? That is the question that catches our attention in the Supreme Court’s decision vindicating the Lone Star State on redistricting. The Nine overruled a lower court that had found that the legislature that promulgated new electoral maps was tainted by an “intent” to discriminate against Latinos. Yet for such a finding, the Justices decided (by a vote of five to four), the lower courts failed to meet the burden of proof. That’s a serious failure.
Already have a subscription? Sign in to continue reading
Cancel anytime
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
Cancel anytime