Pakistan Is Abuzz With News That It Produced the London Bombers

This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

The New York Sun

For the last few days, at dinner parties, bazaars, and newspaper offices in Lahore, there has only been one topic of conversation: the fear and expectancy that the London bombers would turn out to be Pakistani.


Most were convinced that that would be the case and when the truth came out, they were immediately on their cell phones, spreading the news repeating: “What did I tell you, I told you so, this will really be the icing on the cake.”


Many were depressed at the thought of being dubbed a nation that could export a handful of terrorists along with T-shirts, Sufi music, and mangoes.


Until Tuesday, the fear of a right-wing British backlash against Pakistanis living in Britain had also dominated the headlines. That is because Pakistanis are deeply sensitive about their own, even though after 58 years, they still cannot agree on the nature of their nation – Islamic fundamentalist or democratic.


Those who have lived in Bradford and Leeds for two generations still come home to marry, party, vacation, and celebrate religious festivals like Eid, or Ramadan, the month of fasting.


Flights to and from London are packed in the summer.


Youngsters in sneakers, the latest jeans, and speaking English in broad Yorkshire accents can be heard in Lahore’s shopping malls during any holiday period. However, more conservative parents in Yorkshire take leaves of absence for their teenage sons from their British schools and send them home to study for a couple of terms. They either join madrassas or secular schools, learning Urdu, the Koran, and making friends.


Those boys who join madrassa boarding schools are often indoctrinated with fundamentalist views and return home to Yorkshire changed people – urging their sisters to cover their heads and their friends to pray regularly.


In the winter of 2002, a fundamentalist religious leader and politician from Chakwal in central Punjab, Maulana Akram Awan, set up camp outside Islamabad with thousands of followers.


He threatened to march on the capital to force the military regime to enforce Islamic law.


Among those camping out in the fields with him were dozens of madrassa students from Yorkshire. The elite’s fear of a backlash against British Pakistanis is heightened by the fact that London is their second home, the favorite holiday destination to escape the summer heat, shop till they drop, and still the best place to send their children to university. Right now, during the summer sales, a visiting Pakistani can hardly walk down a street in Knightsbridge or Kensington without bumping into a Pakistani he knows from home.


On Tuesday night, the first thought for many of them was how suspiciously they would be viewed when they showed their passports at Heathrow. But when they sit down to reflect as more emerges about the London bombers, they are likely become even more depressed.


It is already clear that one or two of the bombers visited Pakistan recently, possibly to train with an extremist group.


For the past two decades, a small number of militants have killed and maimed their fellow citizens in the name of Islam, various Islamic sects, or self-created concepts of male honor.


These killing fields in the name of Islam, abhorred by the majority of their fellow citizens, were then exported abroad where Pakistani terrorist groups supported fellow extremists in Kashmir, Afghanistan, Central Asia, Chechnya, and the former Yugoslavia.


Pakistani extremists have been closely linked to the army, which saw in them a cheap and non-attributable opportunity to keep India at bay, maintain the country’s Islamic influence abroad, and undermine any chance of civilian democracy at home.


This “military-mullah” alliance is widely assumed to have been born in 1977 after the army coup that bought General Zia Ul Haq to power. However, in a new book called “Pakistan: between Mosque and Military,” scholar diplomat Hussain Haqqani shows how the alliance goes back as far as 1951.


Many Pakistanis hoped that the events of September 11, 2001, would give the army a chance to change its disastrous policies and end its alliance with the mullahs.


President Musharraf’s military regime could make peace with Afghanistan and India, crack down hard on terrorist groups, and turn its back on extremism.


President Musharraf promised a policy of enlightened moderation, but little has been done. Thousands of religious schools still spew out hate against non-Muslims and leaders of militant groups still wander the country giving sermons.


Pakistan’s president has squandered the lavish aid and support given to him by America and Britain after September 11, 2001. Extremism continues to flourish and democracy is further away than ever.


This month, the widely circulated magazine Herald reports that a dozen training camps for terrorists, closed down after September 11, were revived in May with official blessing.


Last month, several Pakistani-Americans arrested on terrorism charges in California admitted to training in such camps. The London bombers were probably in touch with a local Pakistani group rather than Al Qaeda.


Pakistanis are fed up with being in the eye of the storm and just want to lead a normal life. They want to see an end to violence at home and a bad image abroad. When that will happen is anybody’s guess.


The New York Sun

© 2025 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used.

The New York Sun

Sign in or  create a free account

or
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use