Zimbabwe Opposition Pleads for U.N. Peacekeepers
This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

HARARE, Zimbabwe — Violence-wracked Zimbabwe needs United Nations peacekeepers to help prepare the way for new elections, the country’s opposition leader said in a call from his haven at the Dutch Embassy.
“We need a force to protect the people,” Morgan Tsvangirai wrote in an opinion piece published today in London’s The Guardian newspaper.
Mr. Tsvangirai pulled out of a presidential runoff against President Robert Mugabe scheduled for Friday, saying attacks on his supporters by police, soldiers, and militant Mugabe party members has made a free and fair vote impossible.
Mr. Tsvangirai remains at the Dutch Embassy in Harare, where he sought refuge following the announcement of his withdrawal on Sunday after getting a tip soldiers were headed to his home.
“We do not want armed conflict, but the people of Zimbabwe need the words of indignation from global leaders to be backed by the moral rectitude of military force,” he said. “Such a force would be in the role of peacekeepers, not troublemakers. They would separate the people from their oppressors and cast the protective shield around the democratic process for which Zimbabwe yearns.”
Mr. Mugabe, by all indications intent on extending his nearly three-decade rule, insists Friday’s vote will go ahead and he has grown only more defiant in the face of growing international pressure.
Today, opposition officials said police raided one of their provincial offices. Scores of opposition activists, including high-ranking party members, have been attacked or killed. The party’s No. 2 leader has been jailed since earlier this month on treason charges — which can carry the death penalty.
Mr. Tsvangirai called Mr. Mugabe a “power-crazed despot holding his people hostage to his delusions, crushing the spirit of his country and casting the international community as fools.”
In New York, Zimbabwe’s ambassador to the United Nations said that an American and British-led conspiracy fooled the U.N. Security Council into concluding the violence gripping his nation has made it impossible to hold a fair presidential election.
“We see the international community, the Security Council, has been duped into believing that there is lawlessness in Zimbabwe and the opposition cannot campaign, which is not true,” Boniface Chidyausiku told The Associated Press yesterday.
A day after the 15-nation council unanimously condemned the violence in Zimbabwe, Mr. Chidyausiku said his government can still fairly re-elect President Robert Mugabe on Friday even though Mr. Tsvangirai dropped from the race.
His party said Mr. Tsvangirai would address reporters “on the way forward” later today, but did not say where the briefing would be held.
In The Guardian, Mr. Tsvangirai acknowledged that calling for international intervention was sensitive, but said it would offer “the best chance the people of Zimbabwe would get to see their views recorded fairly and justly.”
Regional heads of state, meanwhile, were meeting in Swaziland in hopes of finding a solution for Zimbabwe.
The Southern African Development Community meeting, though, did not include President Thabo Mbeki of South Africa. He was appointed by the bloc more than a year ago to mediate between Messrs. Mugabe and Tsvangirai, and in recent weeks has come under pressure to abandon his tactic of “quiet diplomacy.”
Mr. Mbeki has refused to publicly denounce Mr. Mugabe even as other African leaders step up their criticism, saying confrontation could backfire.
Mr. Mbeki’s spokesman said late yesterday that Mr. Mbeki was not going to Swaziland because he is not a member of the security committee of the regional bloc, which called the meeting. Mr. Mbeki’s deputy foreign minister, Aziz Pahad, told reporters that South Africa may yet send an envoy to neighboring Swaziland — the countries’ capitals are a few hours drive apart.
Mediation efforts appear aimed at bringing Messrs. Mugabe and Tsvangirai together in a coalition government.
President Abdoulaye Wade of Senegal, who has also been trying to broker an agreement, said yesterday that Mr. Mbeki was trying to persuade Messrs. Mugabe and Tsvangirai to share power in a transitional government with Mr. Mugabe as president and Mr. Tsvangirai as prime minister. Mr. Wade was also proposing that Mr. Tsvangirai take a position junior to Mr. Mugabe’s, but not that the coalition be considered merely transitional.
Neither proposal appeared to have been embraced by the rivals.
Mr. Tsvangirai has insisted he be president and Mr. Mugabe have no role. His claim to leadership is based on his having come first in a field of four in the first round of presidential voting March 29, though he did not win the 50% plus one vote necessary to avoid a runoff. Mr. Tsvangirai’s party and its allies also won control of Parliament in the March voting — the first time since independence in 1980 that Mugabe’s ZANU-PF party failed to win a parliamentary majority.
South African officials have offered no details of Mr. Mbeki’s mediation agenda. Mr. Pahad, his deputy foreign minister, rejected criticism.
“We can only say mediation fails if Zimbabwe gets totally engulfed in a state of civil war. It’s not there yet,” Mr. Pahad told reporters in the South African capital today. “There are three more days to go (before the vote) and the situation demands we do everything possible to get Zimbabweans to agree on the way forward.”
Mr. Tsvangirai, who has called on Mr. Mbeki to step down as mediator, wrote in The Guardian that Mr. Mbeki’s approach “sought to massage a defeated dictator rather than show him the door and prod him towards it.”