Seismic Spendthrifts

This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

The New York Sun

One year ago – December 26th 2005 – a tsunami walloped a huge swathe of the world from Indonesia all the way to Africa. Some three hundred thousand people were swept to their deaths, from the grandson of the King of Thailand and the daughter and granddaughter of film director Richard Attenborough to Njoroge, a car mechanic from Nairobi, who picked the wrong day for his first ever visit to the beautiful East African coast, and so died a statistical fluke – his country’s solitary fatality from the disaster.


Across the western world, TV viewers reached into their wallets, chipped in the best part of five billion bucks, and then left it in the hands of the United Nations and the “non-governmental organizations”, the self-proclaimed moral consciences of the world. You’ll recall that, in the immediate wake of the tsunami, Jan Egeland, the Norwegian bureaucrat who’s the big humanitarian honcho at the UN, gave a press conference attacking the “stinginess” of wealthy nations, like the Great Satan. Given that, at that moment, Mr Egeland’s vast, permanent 24/7 “humanitarian relief” bureaucracy was focusing its efforts on giving press conferences in New York, while the only actual “relief effort” was being conducted ad hoc by the Pentagon and the Royal Australian Navy, his remarks seemed a little churlish to say the least.


But the trick when something unexpected happens is to make it fit with your general theory. Thus, if you’re one of those wacky cultists worshiping at the Church of Global Warming, the tsunami is obviously something to do with America not signing the Kyoto Treaty. Likewise, if you’re Mr Egeland, the point of the tsunami is to emphasize his own indispensability. A bunch of Yanks and Aussies saving lives and restoring water supply is no use to him whatsoever unless they do it under the aegis of his agency.


But even folks who aren’t on the Turtle Bay payroll have somehow bought into the curious proposition that helping people without going through the UN bureaucracy – saving lives unilaterally, so to speak – is illegitimate. So Messrs Eddison and Egeland got their way: billions and billions of dollars were contributed to tsunami relief. And what happened to it? One year later, of the 1.8 million left homeless, only 20% have been rehoused. The rest are still in the temporary shelters. Well, okay, but what about the economic revitalization of their communities? If you go to the south Indian coast near the town of Nagapattinam you’ll see a fleet of brand new fishing boats sitting on the beach. A western charity had them built and delivered, but they’ve never been used because they’re not seaworthy, having only two skins of fiberglass. In Sumatra, relief agencies gave interest-free loans to boatbuilders to replace the region’s lost vessels: the replacement skiffs now sit unsold in Indonesian boatyards because nobody thought to also give interest-free loans to the fishermen, who can’t afford to buy the new skiffs.


I don’t pretend to be an expert in the Indonesian fishing industry. I pretend to be an expert in Islamic terrorism and US foreign policy and a bunch of other stuff, and believe me that’s hard enough without trying to feign expertise in the watery economy of Banda Aceh. So who ought to be the experts? Well, how about Jan Egeland and his UN staff? These guys get full-time salaries to think about nothing but international disaster relief, and yet the best they can do when disaster strikes is stand in front of a camera in New York and announce they’re sending someone to the region to conduct an “assessment” of the “situation”, just as soon as the USAF emergency team have flown in and restored room service to the five-star hotel.


It was obvious at the time that western TV viewers had donated more money than could ever be usefully spent. Even so, it’s fascinating to learn quite the multitude of ways in which the dough was squandered. Hitherto somnolent bureaucracies cranked themselves into action for lean mean Tsunami Tshakedown operations. Oxfam paid the best part of a million bucks to Sri Lankan customs officials for the privilege of having 25 four-wheel-drive vehicles allowed into the country to get aid out to remote villages on washed-out roads hit by the Boxing Day tsunami. Your charitable donations at work, folks.


In fact, Mr Egeland was wrong. Had western nations been more “stingy”, the aid might have been better targeted and more effective. As it was, your average Third World kleptocrat official quickly figured out every NGO on the planet was trying to catch his eye by waving large amounts of dollar bills. Next time it might be easier just to eliminate the middle man and have Bono and Sting and Sir Bob Geldof and Sir Elton John and Sir Paul Mc Cartney hold an all-star fundraising gala for the Indonesian Customs Inspectors’ Retirement Fund.


I confess I’ve been antipathetic to the NGOs ever since one of them – in the usual gleaming white Suburban – almost ran me off the road between Rutba and Ramadi in the Sunni Triangle. The western do-gooders are an arrogant lot and, if Iraq’s anything to go by, deeply resented by the locals. And, to be honest, I long ago got sick of their predictions of disasters that never happened – “The head of the World Food Programme has warned that Iraq could spiral into a massive humanitarian disaster”, “The UN Children’s Fund has estimated that as many as 100,000 Afghan children could die of cold, disease and hunger”, etc.


It’s one thing to invent humanitarian disasters to disparage Bush’s unilateralist warmongering, but after the tsunami the UN was reduced to inventing a humanitarian disaster in order to distract attention from the existing humanitarian disaster it wasn’t doing anything about. So its agencies issued hysterical warnings about post-tsunami health consequences – dysentery, cholera, BSE from waterlogged cattle, etc – that, they assured us, would kill as many people as the original disaster. How much difference would it have made if the professional humanitarian bureaucracy had gone to the Riviera for the month after the tsunami? In Iraq, the NGOs skedaddled out of the country after the bombing of UN headquarters in the summer of 2003 – and it made absolutely no difference.


How come no one’s interested in what happened to those billions of dollars? Within 24 hours of Hurricane Katrina making landfall, the media were demanding investigations into what, by historical standards, was a better than average Federal performance. With the tsunami, who cares? The glow of moral virtue in chipping in your donation is so bright the fact that it accomplishes nothing is unimportant. As if to confirm that, Time magazine, in yet another milestone on its accelerating plummet into irrelevance, nominated as its Persons of the Year Bono, Bill Gates and Bill Gates, missus – three do-gooders who believe the solution to the problems of the developing world require more western money. No, the solution is more accountability for the money they’ve already had, and the tsunami would be a good place to start.



© Mark Steyn 2005


The New York Sun

© 2024 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used.

The New York Sun

Sign in or  Create a free account

or
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use