
Grok Bot Is Better Than Its Name Suggests
By ROSS ANDERSON
|A clash is brewing between the special counsel and the 45th president over who holds the constitutional high ground.

A new and potentially decisive issue is moving to the fore in the trials of President Trump. It has to do with the legal concept of prejudice. The question is who would be meaningfully prejudiced — legal lingo for harmed — by a delay of the trials. Is it Mr. Trump or Special Counsel Jack Smith?

By ROSS ANDERSON
|
By JOSEPH CURL
|
By BETSY McCAUGHEY
|
By LAURENCE ELDER
|
By GARY GASTELU
|
By JOSEPH CURL
|
By DAVID JONES
|
By JOSEPH CURL
|A new and potentially decisive issue is moving to the fore in the trials of President Trump. It has to do with the legal concept of prejudice. The question is who would be meaningfully prejudiced — legal lingo for harmed — by a delay of the trials. Is it Mr. Trump or Special Counsel Jack Smith?
Already have a subscription? Sign in to continue reading
Cancel anytime
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
Cancel anytime