
Out of Adversity, a Japanese American Design Vision
By MARIO NAVES
|This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

Published:
Updated:
Throughout most of art history, there was little concern about the politics of portraiture. Whether the sitter was a paying client or a paid (or unpaid) model, the arrangement with the artist was thought to be straightforward and mutually beneficial. But with modernism, new critical ideas about artistic subjectivity and increased sensitivity to issues of exploitation and objectification significantly complicated this oncesimple genre. As a result, artists today sometimes go to great conceptual lengths to create what they consider to be socially conscious portraits.

By MARIO NAVES
|
By GARY GASTELU
|
By ALEX ZDAN
|
By HOLLIE McKAY
|
By A.R. HOFFMAN
|
By HOLLIE McKAY
|
By HOLLIE McKAY
|
By HOLLIE McKAY
|Throughout most of art history, there was little concern about the politics of portraiture. Whether the sitter was a paying client or a paid (or unpaid) model, the arrangement with the artist was thought to be straightforward and mutually beneficial. But with modernism, new critical ideas about artistic subjectivity and increased sensitivity to issues of exploitation and objectification significantly complicated this oncesimple genre. As a result, artists today sometimes go to great conceptual lengths to create what they consider to be socially conscious portraits.
Already have a subscription? Sign in to continue reading
Cancel anytime
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
Cancel anytime