The Lottery of the Vote

This article is from the archive of The New York Sun before the launch of its new website in 2022. The Sun has neither altered nor updated such articles but will seek to correct any errors, mis-categorizations or other problems introduced during transfer.

The New York Sun

He might be headed for another close election, which means your vote could really matter this time, right? Wrong. Your vote didn’t matter in 2000, it never mattered before 2000, and it’s very unlikely to start mattering now.


Last time around, everything came down to Florida, where President Bush’s official margin was 537 votes. Yes, yes, I know, if they’d been counted differently, there’d have been a different margin and perhaps a different outcome. But that’s not what this column is about.


If any one of Florida’s 6 million voters had stayed home, Mr. Bush’s margin would have been 536 or 538 votes, and he’d still have won. Even if you voted in the most hotly disputed state in the mostly hotly disputed election in American history, your vote did not change the outcome.


Your individual vote will never matter unless the election in your state is within one vote of a dead-even tie. And even then, it will matter only if your state tips the balance in the Electoral College. What are the odds of that?


Well, let’s suppose you live in Florida and that Florida’s 6 million voters are statistically evenly divided – meaning that each of them has – as far as you know – exactly a 50/50 chance of voting for either Mr. Bush or Senator Kerry – the statistical equivalent of a coin toss. Then the probability you’ll break a tie is equal to the probability that exactly 3 million out of 6 million tosses will turn up heads. That’s about 1 in 3,100 – roughly the same as the probability you’ll be murdered by your mother.


And that’s surely a gross overestimate of your influence, because it assumes there’s no bias at all in your neighbors’ preferences. Even a slight change in that assumption leads to a dramatic change in the conclusion. If Mr. Kerry or Mr. Bush has just a slight edge, so that each of your fellow voters has a 51% likelihood of voting for him, then your chance of casting the tiebreaker is about 1 in 10 to the 1,046th power – approximately the same chance you have of winning the Powerball jackpot 128 times in a row.


For those of us who live in New York State, the situation is far worse. Last time around, about 6.5 million votes were cast for major party candidates in New York State and 63% of them went to Vice President Gore. Assuming an electorate of similar size with a similar bias, my chance of casting the deciding vote in New York is about 1 in 10 to the 200,708th power. I have a better chance of winning the Powerball jackpot 7,400 times in a row than of affecting the election’s outcome. Which makes it pretty hard to see why I should vote.


The traditional reply begins with the phrase “But if everyone thought like that….” To which the correct rejoinder is: So what? Everyone doesn’t think like that. They continue to vote by the millions and tens of millions.


Even for the most passionate partisan, it’s hard to argue that voting is a good use of your time. Instead of waiting in line to vote, you could wait in line to buy a lottery ticket, hoping to win $100 million and use it to advance your causes – and all with an almost indescribably greater chance of success than you’d have in the voting booth.



Mr. Landsburg is the author, most recently, of “Fair Play: What Your Child Can Teach You About Economics, Values, and the Meaning Of Life.” From Slate.


The New York Sun

© 2025 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used.

The New York Sun

Sign in or  Create a free account

or
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use