Trump Knows a Durable Peace in the Middle East Hangs on Ending Militant Islamic Leadership of Iran

An immense cloud of mythology and speculation has instantly arisen in the vortex between President Trump’s recent statement that he did not wish America to have to return every two years to deprive Iran of its nuclear military capacity, and his apparently somewhat contradictory statement that since almost all the American and Israeli war aims had been achieved, the Iran War could probably soon be wound down.We have seen enough of Mr. Trump to know that he does not speak idly or with unintended predictable consequences, but rather enjoys confusing his opponents, rarely becoming highly concerned if he confuses his supporters as well. In general, the president’s opinions on the progress of the Iran war conform to those of his principal military spokesmen as well as those authorized to speak for the government of Israel, that the allies are well ahead of their original schedule and have eliminated 90 percent of Iran’s ability to fire ballistic missiles and drones.As even Muhanad Seloom remarked in Al Jazeera on March 16, on the day the war began, February 28, Iran launched 350 missiles and on March 14 only 25 and in the same period, drone launches fell to 75 from 800. This isn’t entirely consistent with some descriptions of Iranian missile attacks on Gulf states but there is no possible dispute that the Iranian military capability has been severely diminished every day.It is understandable that the American administration has been imprecise about its war objectives. This is like the controversy in World War II over President Franklin Roosevelt’s insistence that the allies required the “unconditional surrender” of their enemies. It has been alleged that this stiffened the German and Japanese resolve, even though it was clear to everyone that the withdrawal from the Axis of Italy was agreed on a basis far short of unconditional surrender and Italy was soon an ally of the West at war with Germany.There appears to be no dispute that the allies’ war aim is to ensure that Iran will never again threaten the world with nuclear weapons nor continue to bankroll and supply terrorist organizations. Mr. Trump stipulated that right after his comment about winding down the war. By normal rational standards, that is no great sacrifice for Iran to make and is a far remove from unconditional surrender. If the Americans and Israelis were to conclude that they had achieved their war aims and were effectively unilaterally ending the war by making it clear that if Iran continued the war after the purported U.S.-Israel ceasefire, the counterstroke would be overwhelmingly disproportionate, it is almost certainly the case that Iran would successfully represent this at least to the Muslim world as victory. Its opponents would have got much the best of the fighting, but they would have failed to destroy or significantly alter the policy objectives of the Islamic Republic.The horrible tyranny constantly inflicted upon the people of Iran would continue; the government would resume its plan to arm itself to the teeth with missiles and relaunch their nuclear military program, and they would’ve made the inaccurate point that they were capable of shutting down the exportation of oil from the Persian Gulf to the world. America has substantially overwhelmed Iran’s forces of intimidation and interdiction in the Strait.For Mr. Trump, this would be, as he has stated, an intolerable outcome. So whatever he means by “winding down the war” having achieved his principal objectives, it is not what venerable readers will recall when Senator George Aiken of Vermont advised President Lyndon Johnson to announce that he had won the war in Vietnam and to leave “by plane and by ship.”This was on the mistaken assumption that the war could not be won; it could have been won by cutting the Ho Chi Minh Trail, as Douglas MacArthur and Dwight Eisenhower advised, or probably even by President Nixon’s Vietnamization policy accompanied by heavy American air support when necessary, if this option had not been foreclosed by the suicidally partisan nonsense of Watergate.In Iran it could be that a military faction will be incentivized to overthrow the theocracy and credibly abandon the ambition to become a nuclear power and the ambition to export and subsidize terror and particularly to assault the right of Israel to exist as a Jewish state. Any Iranian regime that seized power at Tehran and throughout the country and plausibly promised such a course correction, could obtain peace quickly.It is also possible that, as in Venezuela, there could be further personnel changes and what still purported to be the Islamic Republic made credible and enforceable guarantees of the abandonment of the nuclear program and the promotion of terrorism. It is possible that the entire corrupt and evil regime could collapse completely, overwhelmed by military defeat, demoralization, factionalism, and public hatred. Any of these would be acceptable, but the George Aiken formula, which Mr. Trump’s opponents are bandying about, is not.Mr. Trump knows better than anyone that the elimination of militant Islam from the headship of one of the Middle East’s most important countries is necessary to produce a durable peace in the Middle East and alter the world balance of power in favor of the Western democracies by defeating international terrorism and removing Iran from the entourage of Beijing and Moscow, on the heels of Syria, Venezuela, and Cuba. The president also knows that this achievement, added to his numerous other accomplishments, will establish him as one of America’s outstanding presidents, not least because of the psychotic fervor of many of his domestic opponents.

Trump Knows a Durable Peace in the Middle East Hangs on Ending Militant Islamic Leadership of Iran

More from the New York Sun

Israel and Lebanon Coordinate Aid Convoy to Christian Villages in Combat Zone

Emerging Claim That Targeting Civilian Infrastructure Is a War Crime Proves a Bridge Too Far

Stanford Calls Bluff on Students Using Jain Faith To Dodge Meal Plan

More from the New York Sun

Israel and Lebanon Coordinate Aid Convoy to Christian Villages in Combat Zone

Emerging Claim That Targeting Civilian Infrastructure Is a War Crime Proves a Bridge Too Far

Stanford Calls Bluff on Students Using Jain Faith To Dodge Meal Plan

South Florida GOP Congresswoman’s Immigration Reform Bill Sparks Backlash From Colleagues, Conservative Commentariat

Middle-Class Americans Prove the Biggest Winners From Trump’s Tax Cuts in the Big Beautiful Bill

In a Funeral for Economic Liberty, the Casket Cartel Seeks To Bury the Competition

The Double Tragedy of the Jewish Bund

Borrowing a Page From El Salvador’s Bukele, Ecuadoran President Welcomes American Troops To Assist With His Drug Gang Crackdown