Iranian Drones in Russia’s Arsenal Complicate Nuclear Deal Talks
Opponents of a deal say lifting sanctions on Tehran could enable Russia to strengthen its war effort in Ukraine and circumvent penalties imposed after the February invasion.

Russia has obtained hundreds of Iranian drones capable of being used in its war against Ukraine despite America’s warnings to Tehran not to ship them, according to Western intelligence officials.
It is unclear whether Russia has begun flying the drones against Ukrainian targets, but the drones appear to be operational and ready to use, the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive intelligence, said.
The reported shipment marks the latest sign of increasing military cooperation between longtime allies Russia and Iran. It also underscores warnings from critics of the ongoing negotiations for Iran to resume its compliance with the 2015 nuclear deal that America left in 2018. An agreement for Iran and the U.S. to return to the deal, which would grant Iran billions of dollars in sanctions relief in return for curbs on its nuclear program, is inching forward.
Opponents of a deal say lifting sanctions on Tehran could enable Russia to strengthen its war effort in Ukraine and circumvent penalties imposed after the February invasion by funneling oil and other products through Iran.
The arrival of the drones in the Ukraine war was first reported by the Washington Post.
Ukraine has made great use of drones for surveilling and attacking Russian targets in the six-month war, relying on technology supplied by the U.S. and other partners, including Turkey. An explosive device carried by a drone last month struck the headquarters of Russia’s Black Sea Fleet on the Crimean Peninsula, injuring several people. Supporters of Ukraine have also raised money to buy drones for the war effort.
Facing economic sanctions and limits on its supply chains due to its invasion of Ukraine, Russia has increasingly turned to Iran as a key partner and supplier of weapons. The White House first publicly warned last month that Iran was planning to supply Moscow with “hundreds” of armed drones. Days later, it alleged Russian officials had visited Iran twice to arrange a transfer.
Speaking last month, Iran’s foreign minister, Hossein-Amir Abdollahian, said Tehran had “various types of collaboration with Russia, including in the defense sector.”
“But we won’t help either of the sides involved in this war because we believe that it needs to be stopped,” he said.
Iran’s mission to the United Nations did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The signs of increased cooperation between Moscow and Tehran have added to concerns about the nuclear talks. President Biden’s administration this week responded to Iran’s latest offer to resume compliance with the previous agreement.
There is now expected to be another exchange of technical details followed by a meeting of the joint commission that oversees the deal. The developments, including stepped-up public messaging campaigns by both Tehran and Washington, as well as Israel, which is opposed to a deal, suggest that an agreement could be near.
The Israelis continue to have broad concerns about reviving a deal they had vehemently opposed in 2015, but are also wary of language included in the proposed European text that covers additional items, according to diplomats familiar with Israel’s position.
Israel has made its stance clear in public statements this week by Prime Minister Lapid and in private conversations in Washington involving Israel’s national security adviser and its defense minister, Benny Gantz, who will meet Mr. Biden’s national security adviser, Jake Sullivan, on Friday.
Israeli officials worry a return to the deal will only boost Iran’s cooperation with Russia, including potentially allowing Moscow to evade Ukraine-related sanctions by exporting energy through Iran if the sanctions are eased, the diplomats, who were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity, said.
They said Israel is concerned about provisions related to the expiration of restrictions on Iran’s atomic program that will remain the same as in the initial agreement. That means what had been a 10-year or 15-year ban on certain activities would now be only a three-year or eight-year ban.
On Thursday, the head of Israel’s Mossad, David Barnea, said that Washington “is rushing into an accord that is ultimately based on lies.” In comments to Israeli media, Mr. Barnea said the deal would give Iran “license to amass the required nuclear material for a bomb” in just a few years, and the billions of dollars Tehran would receive from assets that are now frozen would increase instability because of Iranian proxies in the region.
Chief among those are Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed terrorist group firmly entrenched in Lebanon and with whom Israel fought a war in the summer of 2006.