Libby’s Lawyers Ask Judge To Dismiss Indictment

WASHINGTON – Lawyers for Vice President Cheney’s former top aide asked a federal judge yesterday to dismiss his indictment because the special prosecutor in the CIA leak case lacked authority to bring the charges.In a court filing, lawyers for I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby said his indictment violates the Constitution because Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald was not appointed by the president with the consent of the Senate.The defense attorneys also said Mr. Fitzgerald’s appointment violates federal law because his investigation was not supervised by the attorney general. They said only Congress can approve such an arrangement.“Those constitutional and statutory provisions have been violated in this case,” Mr. Libby’s lawyers wrote.Mr. Fitzgerald was appointed in December 2003 after former Attorney General John Ashcroft recused himself from the investigation because of his close relationships with White House officials. Then-Deputy Attorney General James Comey, acting in Mr. Ashcroft’s place in the matter, selected Mr. Fitzgerald.Mr. Comey gave Mr. Fitzgerald sweeping power to conduct the investigation into the leak of CIA operative Valerie Plame’s identity, exempting the special counsel from following rules that apply to all American attorneys throughout the nation.Unlike every other federal prosecutor, Mr. Fitzgerald did not have to seek approval from senior Justice Department officials to grant immunity or subpoena reporters and news organizations. Nor did he have to advise senior Justice officials before he sought Mr. Libby’s indictment.“The attorney general may delegate powers but he may not abdicate responsibility,” Mr. Libby’s lawyers wrote.Mr. Libby, 55, who resigned as Mr. Cheney’s chief of staff after he was indicted, is charged with lying about how he learned Ms. Plame’s identity and when he subsequently told reporters. He faces five counts of perjury, false statements and obstruction of justice.Ms. Plame’s identity as a CIA operative was published in July 2003 by columnist Robert Novak after her husband, former U.S. Ambassador Joseph Wilson, accused the administration of twisting intelligence about Iraq’s efforts to buy uranium “yellowcake” in Niger. The year before, the CIA had sent Mr. Wilson to Niger to determine the accuracy of the uranium reports.Mr. Libby’s lawyers warned U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton that he may need to require the Justice Department to turn over records – including a secret letter from Mr. Comey to Mr. Fitzgerald – to determine whether the special counsel’s appointment is legal.Defense attorneys and Mr. Fitzgerald will appear in U.S. District Court Friday to argue over defense requests for classified records and evidence gathered by the prosecution about reporters who learned about Ms. Plame from government officials other than Mr. Libby.Mr. Libby’s trial is set for January 2007.If the case goes to trial, defense attorneys have signaled that Mr. Libby likely will testify that he was so busy with national security issues that he forgot or incorrectly recalled conversations he had with reporters about “less important topics,” such as Ms. Plame.

Libby’s Lawyers Ask Judge To Dismiss Indictment

More from the New York Sun

Fauci’s Refusal To Answer Questions Matches Hubris of America’s Botched Covid Response

America Risks Falling Behind Communist China in the AI Development Race

State Department Tells Americans To Prepare To Flee From Middle East

More from the New York Sun

Fauci’s Refusal To Answer Questions Matches Hubris of America’s Botched Covid Response

America Risks Falling Behind Communist China in the AI Development Race

State Department Tells Americans To Prepare To Flee From Middle East

Trump Threatens to Revive Anti-Weaponization Fund as Blanche Nomination Stalls

Spain Claims Ceuta Crisis Easing, With Most Migrants Already Returned to Morocco

George Santos Agrees to $35,000 To Settle Federal Probe Over Kalshi Trades

Infantino Abandons Kushner Deal But Fails To Halt Global FIFA Uprising

Trump Lashes Out at Pirro Over Dropped Reflecting Pool Case: ‘I Disagree 100%’