
Paramount and Warner Bros. — the Foreign State Problem
By THE NEW YORK SUN
|In the E. Jean Carroll case the 47th president petitions the Supreme Court on the bedrock of due process.

President Trump’s cert petition to the Supreme Court to hear his $5 million defamation judgment in the E. Jean Carroll case exposes constitutional bedrock — a defendant’s right to be convicted only on admissible evidence. Mr. Trump contends that the trial judge, Lewis Kaplan issued a “series of indefensible evidentiary rulings” that introduced “highly inflammatory propensity evidence” that unlawfully prejudiced the jury and distorted the verdict.

By THE NEW YORK SUN
|
By DEAN KARAYANIS
|
By JENNIFER DOHERTY
|
By LUKE FUNK
|
By BRADLEY CORTRIGHT
|
By ALEX ZDAN
|
By VERONIQUE de RUGY
|
By JENNIFER DOHERTY
|President Trump’s cert petition to the Supreme Court to hear his $5 million defamation judgment in the E. Jean Carroll case exposes constitutional bedrock — a defendant’s right to be convicted only on admissible evidence. Mr. Trump contends that the trial judge, Lewis Kaplan issued a “series of indefensible evidentiary rulings” that introduced “highly inflammatory propensity evidence” that unlawfully prejudiced the jury and distorted the verdict.
Already have a subscription? Sign in to continue reading
Cancel anytime
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
Cancel anytime