A Midterm ‘Thumping’ for Republicans Could Prompt the Party to Chart a New Post-Trump Course

With less than two weeks until the midterm elections, things look bad for President Trump’s Republican Party. Generic polls show significant movement toward Democrats and away from Republicans since Mr. Trump defeated Vice President Harris by 50 percent to 48 percent two years ago.Republicans seem doomed to lose their exceedingly narrow House majority, although redistricting by both parties over the past two years has reduced the number of competitive seats and will likely limit their losses.More surprisingly, in view of the 2024 results, the Republicans’ Senate majority seems in jeopardy, as Democrats have been leading in polls in Alaska, Iowa, Ohio, and Texas, states that Trump carried easily three times.And Democratic leads in two Southern states that have been seriously contested in each presidential cycle, Georgia and North Carolina, are so solid that Republicans have written them off as irretrievably lost.Two questions remain unanswered. The first will be settled by the election results, although that could take weeks given Alaska’s ranked choice voting system and California’s breathtakingly slow counting of ballots in contested House races. The second will shape election analysts’ forecasts for at least the next two years.The first question is whether polls are understating Republican support, as they did in the presidential cycles of 2016, 2020, and 2024. The second is whether the move away from Republicans and toward Democrats will turn out to be a realignment away from the rough partisan parity that has prevailed for more than 30 years.Starting with the presidential election of 1992 and the congressional election of 1994, Democrats have won the presidency five times and Republicans four, while Republicans have won House majorities 12 times and Democrats five.Only one presidential nominee, Barack Obama in 2008, has won more than 51 percent of the popular vote, and neither party has held more than 257 of the House’s 435 seats. Democrats held the 60 Senate seats needed to overcome a filibuster for just seven months, between July 2009 and February 2010; Republicans never reached that threshold.Democratic majorities of that magnitude are at the high end of, or even a bit beyond, what current polling suggests. The party would be winning over some who had been voting regularly for Mr. Trump and Republicans or benefiting from those individuals not voting at all.And it would be winning just enough support to prevail in a solid majority of what look to be very close races. That is not so surprising, since Senate elections tend to be decided on national issues, and often all the close ones go one way.Yet it’s also possible that polls are misleading. In past years, RealClearPolitics analyst Sean Trende has argued, polls have overstated Democrats’ chances in Republican states and vice versa. This year, the close races are on Republican turf, and if the polls prove to misfire that way again, Democratic gains may turn out to be minimal.Republicans could hold on to a Senate majority in that case. That means Trump appointees to federal courts, including the Supreme Court, could be confirmed, and impeachment trials would likely go nowhere.What about the consequences further out, specifically for 2028? Minimal losses for Republicans might lead to a presidential endorsement and nomination of Vice President Vance. The risks of damage from Mr. Trump’s personal preoccupations — from tariffs to the triumphal arch — may seem less serious than the risks of outright rebellion against a leader eager to punish anything less than full devotion.But a “thumping” — President George W. Bush’s term for his party’s repudiation in 2006 — could leave many Republicans wondering whether the party needs, after a decade of domination by Mr. Trump, to take a different course. Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s erudite speeches in February at Munich and this month at Athens, combined with his careful defenses of administration foreign policy, provide an alternative approach that chastened Republicans might prefer.Democrats can be counted on, however great or minimal their gains, to pepper Mr. Trump and those around him with investigations, to stage votes for impeachment, and — if they have a Senate majority — to block confirmation of a Supreme Court nominee or any federal judge at all.Yet they also face their own sharp divisions. Their lack of any articulate domestic platform leaves them open to members of the Democratic Socialists of America pushing radical and potentially unpopular measures such as “Medicare for All” — under which workers who like their health insurance can’t keep it. On foreign policy, they will probably try to hobble military operations against Iran and, with Senator Chuck Schumer looking over his shoulder at Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, may try to block military cooperation with Israel.The result of one Senate contest in particular, the race in Michigan, may affect the course forward. There, Democratic nominee Abdul El-Sayed has led Republican Mike Rogers in every public poll since late September, but in only one of eight polls by more than 2 percentage points. A polling error would not be shocking in Michigan, and while Dr. El-Sayed went into the August primary with a polling lead of 50 percent to 40 percent, he beat a more centrist Democrat, Representative Haley Stevens by only 48.4 percent to 47.6 percent in actual votes.Republican Mike Rogers has led in only three of 29 public polls conducted since the August primary, but Dr. El-Sayed’s average lead has narrowed from 48 percent to 44 percent in August and September to 47 percent to 46 percent in October. Dr. El-Sayed’s refusal to to say whether he considers Iran or Israel the greatest threat to the United States has evidently not strengthened his appeal.A victory for the articulate Dr. El-Sayed would make him a national leader of “progressive” Democrats. An El-Sayed defeat would give Republicans a seat held by Democrats since 1978 and might convince many Democrats and some in the press that “Medicare for All” at home and opposition to Israel abroad are not a formula for their party’s success.And what of the prospects for realignment beyond 2028? You could argue that it seems to be on schedule, perhaps overdue. The 1992 presidential and 1994 congressional elections were propelled by President Clinton and Speaker Newt Gingrich, both baby boomers by the definitions in Strauss and Howe’s “Generations.”The seven presidents in the previous 40 years, all with military service in World War II, were born between 1911 and 1924. The five presidents since, three of them born in 1946 and the other two in 1942 and 1961, had no military service except for the younger Mr. Bush’s in the Texas Air National Guard.Starting in the 1990s, the South became the electoral heartland of the Republican Party, and the Northeast and Pacific coasts became the electoral heartlands of the Democratic Party. Starting in the 1990s and accelerating after Mr. Trump’s first run, Democrats have made gains among the affluent and college educated, and Republicans among blue-collar workers and non-college graduates. Few predicted these trends, established politicians tried to buck them, and many thoughtful citizens haven’t absorbed them yet. I’d like to say I’ll describe what happens next, but having started writing for publication about these things in 1963, I’m not sure I’ll be in a position to do so. Perhaps answers will come from Mr. Rubio, born in 1971; Messrs. Vance and El-Sayed, both born in 1984; and Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, born in 1989.Creators.com

A Midterm ‘Thumping’ for Republicans Could Prompt the Party to Chart a New Post-Trump Course

A Midterm ‘Thumping’ for Republicans Could Prompt the Party to Chart a New Post-Trump Course

More from the New York Sun

The Hunger for Hope and a Positive Future

Sinatra Sang Bacharach—But Only Twice

Terence Fisher’s Monsters Rise Again

Toyota Gets Back on the Wagon

Apple Rushes its First Folding iPhone Launch — But Most Buyers Must Wait To Get One

Ohio Governor’s Race Tilts Toward Democrats After Ramaswamy’s Controversial Attack Ad

Kim Jong Un Pays Surprise Visit to Communist China, Reviving Talk of a Possible Summit With Trump

Cézanne, Modigliani, and Soutine: Parisian Rebels Who Made Art Modern Reunite at Brooklyn Museum

More from the New York Sun

The Hunger for Hope and a Positive Future

Sinatra Sang Bacharach—But Only Twice

Terence Fisher’s Monsters Rise Again

Toyota Gets Back on the Wagon

Apple Rushes its First Folding iPhone Launch — But Most Buyers Must Wait To Get One

Ohio Governor’s Race Tilts Toward Democrats After Ramaswamy’s Controversial Attack Ad

Kim Jong Un Pays Surprise Visit to Communist China, Reviving Talk of a Possible Summit With Trump

Cézanne, Modigliani, and Soutine: Parisian Rebels Who Made Art Modern Reunite at Brooklyn Museum