Killing of Survivors of Caribbean Drug Boat Strike Raises Specter of War Crimes — Without a War

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth seems to be a war criminal. Without a war. An interesting achievement.In 1967, novelist Gwyn Griffin published a World War II novel, “An Operational Necessity,” that 58 years later is again pertinent. According to the laws of war, survivors of a sunk ship cannot be attacked. Yet a German submarine captain, after sinking a French ship, orders the machine-gunning of the ship’s crew, lest their survival endanger his men by disclosing where his boat is operating. In the book’s dramatic climax, a postwar tribunal examines the German commander’s moral calculus.No operational necessity justified Mr. Hegseth’s de facto order to kill two survivors clinging to the wreckage of one of the supposed drug boats obliterated by American forces near Venezuela. His order was reported by the Washington Post from two sources (“The order was to kill everybody,” one said), and has not been explicitly denied by Mr. Hegseth. President Trump says Mr. Hegseth told him that he (Mr. Hegseth) “said he did not say that.” If Mr. Trump is telling the truth about Mr. Hegseth, and Mr. Hegseth is telling the truth to Mr. Trump, it is strange that (per the Post report) the commander of the boat-destroying operation said he ordered the attack on the survivors to comply with Mr. Hegseth’s order.Forty-four days after the survivors were killed, the four-star admiral who headed the American Southern Command announced that he would be leaving that position just a year into what is usually a three-year stint. He did not say why. Inferences are, however, permitted.The killing of the survivors by this moral slum of an administration should nauseate Americans. A nation incapable of shame is dangerous, not least to itself. As the recent “peace plan” for Ukraine demonstrated.The secretary of state, Marco Rubio, who is also Mr. Trump’s national security adviser, seemed to be neither when the president released his 28-point plan for Ukraine’s dismemberment. The plan was cobbled together by Trump administration and Russian officials, with no Ukrainians participating. It reads like a wish-list letter from Vladimir Putin to Santa Claus: Ukraine to cede land that Russia has failed to capture in almost four years of aggression; Russia to have a veto over NATO’s composition, peacekeeping forces in Ukraine, and the size of Ukraine’s armed forces. And more.Mr. Rubio, whose well-known versatility of convictions is perhaps not infinite, told some of his alarmed former Senate colleagues that the plan was just an opening gambit from Russia — although Mr. Trump demanded that Ukraine accept it within days. A South Dakota Republican senator, Mike Rounds, a precise and measured speaker, reported that, in a conference call with a bipartisan group of senators, Mr. Rubio said the plan was a Russian proposal. “He made it very clear to us,” Mr. Rounds said, “that we are the recipients of a proposal that was delivered to one of our representatives. It is not our recommendation. It is not our peace plan.” Hours later, however, Mr. Rubio reversed himself, saying on social media that the United States “authored” the plan.The administration’s floundering might reflect more than its characteristic incompetence. In a darkening world, systemic weaknesses of prosperous democracies are becoming clearer.Harvard sociologist Daniel Bell’s 1976 book, “The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism,” argued that capitalism’s success undermines capitalism’s moral and behavioral prerequisites. Affluence produces a culture of present-mindedness and laxity; this undermines thrift, industriousness, discipline and the deferral of gratification.Today’s cultural contradictions of democracy are: Majorities vote themselves government benefits funded by deficits, which conscript the wealth of future generations who will inherit the national debt. Entitlements crowd out provisions for national security. And an anesthetizing dependency on government produces an inward-turning obliviousness to external dangers, and a flinching from hard truths.Two weeks ago, the chief of staff of the French army said: “We have the know-how, and we have the economic and demographic strength to dissuade the regime in Moscow. What we are lacking … is the spirit which accepts that we will have to suffer if we are to protect what we are.” He added: “If our country wavers because it is not ready to lose its children … or to suffer economically because the priority has to be military production, then we are indeed at risk.”Mr. Putin has surely savored the French recoil from these words. And he has noticed that, concerning Ukraine and the attacks on boats near Venezuela, the Trump administration cannot keep its stories straight. This probably is for reasons Sir Walter Scott understood: “Oh, what a tangled web we weave,/ when first we practise to deceive!” Americans are the deceived.The Washington Post

Killing of Survivors of Caribbean Drug Boat Strike Raises Specter of War Crimes — Without a War

More from the New York Sun

Will Friday Diplomacy With the Islamic Republic Lead to a Military Strike?

Angry Liberals Rage Over Washington Post Layoffs, Lash Out at ‘Complicit’ Jeff Bezos

Latest Take on Dracula Legend Offers Sumptuous Spectacle but Scant Horror

More from the New York Sun

Will Friday Diplomacy With the Islamic Republic Lead to a Military Strike?

Angry Liberals Rage Over Washington Post Layoffs, Lash Out at ‘Complicit’ Jeff Bezos

Latest Take on Dracula Legend Offers Sumptuous Spectacle but Scant Horror

Possible Las Vegas Bio Lab Is Linked to a Chinese Man Jailed in California

Harris Bets Big on Social Media With ‘Headquarters’ Launch — But Can It Win Young Voters?

Texas A&M Professor Fired Over Gender Identity Lesson Sues To Get Her Job Back

Virginia Democrats To Try To Eliminate Four GOP Congressional Seats Ahead of November Elections

Israel’s President Calls Arab-Sector Violence a ‘National Emergency’ After Triple Killing