In Rebuke to States Struggling With Wave of Border Crossers, Supreme Court Rejects a Lawsuit Demanding Biden Administration Boost Deportations

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday rejected a Republican-led challenge to a Biden administration policy that prioritizes the deportation of immigrants who are deemed to pose the greatest risk to public safety or were picked up at the border.The justices voted eight to one to allow the long-blocked policy to take effect, recognizing there is not enough money or manpower to deport all 11 million or so people who are in America illegally.Louisiana and Texas had argued that federal immigration law requires authorities to detain and expel those in America illegally even if they pose little or no risk.Yet the court held that the states lacked the legal standing, or right to sue, in the first place.Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in his opinion for the court that the executive branch has no choice but to prioritize enforcement efforts.“That is because the Executive Branch invariably lacks the resources to arrest and prosecute every violator of every law and must constantly react and adjust to the ever-shifting public-safety and public welfare needs of the American people,” Justice Kavanaugh wrote.At the center of the case is a September 2021 directive from the Department of Homeland Security that paused deportations unless individuals had committed acts of terrorism, espionage, or “egregious threats to public safety.” The guidance, issued after President Biden took office, updated a Trump-era policy to remove people who were in the country illegally, regardless of criminal history or community ties.The secretary of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, applauded Friday’s decision, saying it would allow immigration officers “to focus limited resources and enforcement actions on those who pose a threat to our national security, public safety, and border security.”The case displayed a frequently used litigation strategy by Republican attorneys general and other officials that has succeeded in slowing Biden administration initiatives by going to Republican-friendly courts.Texas and Louisiana claimed in their lawsuit that they would face added costs of having to detain people the federal government might allow to remain free inside America, despite their criminal records.Last year, a federal judge in Texas ordered a nationwide halt to the guidance and a federal appellate panel at New Orleans declined to step in.A federal appeals court at Cincinnati had earlier overturned a district judge’s order that put the policy on hold in a lawsuit filed by Arizona, Ohio, and Montana.Yet 11 months ago, when the administration asked the Supreme Court to intervene, the justices voted 5-4 to keep the policy on hold. At the same time, the court agreed to hear the case, which was argued in December.In Friday’s decision, Justice Kavanaugh’s opinion spoke for just five justices, including Chief Justice Roberts and the three liberals. Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, and Amy Coney Barrett agreed with the outcome for other reasons.Justice Samuel Alito filed a solo dissent, writing that the decision improperly favors the president over Congress. “And it renders states already laboring under the effects of massive illegal immigration even more helpless,” Justice Alito wrote.Associated Press

In Rebuke to States Struggling With Wave of Border Crossers, Supreme Court Rejects a Lawsuit Demanding Biden Administration Boost Deportations

In Rebuke to States Struggling With Wave of Border Crossers, Supreme Court Rejects a Lawsuit Demanding Biden Administration Boost Deportations

More from the New York Sun

DOJ Says Kennedy Center May Be Demolished If Trump’s Name Not Added to the Building

In Major Victory for Trump, Darline Graham Wins South Carolina Republican Primary for Full Term in the Senate

As 11,000 Exemption Bids Pour In, City Delays Pied-à-Terre Deadline Again

Pennsylvania’s Josh Shapiro Backtracks on Data Centers and AI Growth, Threatening Keystone State’s Tech Boom

How Chatbots Are Sending Users Spiraling Into a Delusion Dubbed ‘Sycophantic AI’

Democratic Congresswoman Urges Congressional Leaders To Let Lawmakers Add Pictures Into Legislation

The Met’s Understated Madonna: A Rare Leonardo da Vinci Masterpiece Now Discreetly in Full View

‘Paranormal Activity’ Is a Killer Theatrical Experience

More from the New York Sun

DOJ Says Kennedy Center May Be Demolished If Trump’s Name Not Added to the Building

In Major Victory for Trump, Darline Graham Wins South Carolina Republican Primary for Full Term in the Senate

As 11,000 Exemption Bids Pour In, City Delays Pied-à-Terre Deadline Again

Pennsylvania’s Josh Shapiro Backtracks on Data Centers and AI Growth, Threatening Keystone State’s Tech Boom

How Chatbots Are Sending Users Spiraling Into a Delusion Dubbed ‘Sycophantic AI’

Democratic Congresswoman Urges Congressional Leaders To Let Lawmakers Add Pictures Into Legislation

The Met’s Understated Madonna: A Rare Leonardo da Vinci Masterpiece Now Discreetly in Full View

‘Paranormal Activity’ Is a Killer Theatrical Experience