Moral Panic Over AI Surges Ahead of Decisive Midterm Elections

The midterm elections are right around the corner, and both parties are about as popular as a Monday-morning visit to the DMV.The time-tested solution? Find a scapegoat, go negative, and blame the other side.This year the weaponized bogeyman is artificial intelligence.Many Americans are falling for the anti-AI information operation. They shouldn’t.A new poll from Politico has the grisly details: 63 percent of Americans think AI has the potential to “destroy humanity.” A majority of both Democrats and Republicans now think AI could herald the apocalypse.That’s quite a sea change in less than a year. In December 2025, a poll from Navigator Research found Americans split roughly equally among those favoring data centers, opposing data centers, or ambivalent.It’s not hard to figure out what happened.Days before the new Politico poll, Anthropic’s chief executive, Dario Amodei, stressed the same existential stakes, arguing AI industry titans “owe it to humanity to try” to slow down the Frankenstein monster they’ve unleashed on the masses.The Trumpy Elon Musk is calling for an industry slowdown too. Apparently, the world’s wealthiest man isn’t above some anticompetitive regulatory capture.AI industry leaders seem to have settled on a message: Our product is going to kill your job, and it might end all of humanity, but trust us and do what we say anyway.How compelling.It’s not often that you see industry leaders fan the flames of a moral panic ignited by their own product. Harvard Business School should offer a case study on how not to market and sell one’s wares, starring AI executives.Unsurprisingly, given the polling, prominent figures across the political spectrum have found common cause on AI regulation. Earlier this week, Soviet Union-honeymooning communist Bernie Sanders and MAGA maestro Steve Bannon spoke at the same anti-AI confab at Washington, D.C.Support for AI, and especially data centers, is a clear political liability this campaign cycle. That’s why President Obama wants Democrats to emphasize AI regulation on the campaign trail. Data centers could cost Republican John Husted his reelection to the Senate in Ohio. And they could harm Democrat Cait Conley in her run against Mike Lawler in New York’s swingy 17th congressional district.Here’s the thing: Many moral panics aren’t based in reality. The Salem witch trials weren’t based in sound reason. Nor, in more recent memory, were the lockdowns, school closures, and mask mandates of Covid-19.For that matter, what is the current AI doomsaying if not a form of digital Covid?The way out of a baseless moral panic is not to pander to the mob. It is to demonstrate leadership.That’s why we remember Abraham Lincoln and his appeals to natural right — and not Stephen Douglas, who pleaded for might-makes-right “popular sovereignty.”President Trump is making a similar case today. Earlier this week, he dismissed the AI moral panic as a “hoax.”That’s leadership. As the 18th-century conservative British statesman Edmund Burke once said: “Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgment; and he betrays, instead of serving you, if he sacrifices it to your opinion.”Majority sentiment certainly matters. A dose of populism is not just healthy — it’s vital. A society where the elites are wildly out of touch with the commoners is not a society built to last.Yet sometimes majority sentiment is wrong. After all, eugenics, forced sterilizations and anti-miscegenation laws were all once broadly popular.None of this is to say there aren’t valid concerns with AI. There are pressing ethical concerns. AI models should not tell a troubled teenage girl how to harm herself. The algorithms must not help a man rob the local bank.Yet the data center backlash is silly and misplaced. Taken to its logical conclusion, shutting down all data centers would end the internet itself.Would that really be a step forward for humanity?Prudence is a long-forgotten word in the Western political lexicon. Aristotle referred to it as the queen of the virtues and the essence of statesmanship. Lincoln exhibited it in spades.It’s what we desperately need, amidst our crippling AI civil war. Some specific regulations are desirable, even necessary. But many are not. And a full, industry-wide innovation shutdown would be nothing short of suicidal.In the short term, the AI doomsayers are likely to prevail. Mr. Trump’s robustly pro-AI stance won’t help Republicans this November.Yet history books aren’t written on the outcome of a single election. We forget that at our own peril.Creators.com

Moral Panic Over AI Surges Ahead of Decisive Midterm Elections

Moral Panic Over AI Surges Ahead of Decisive Midterm Elections

More from the New York Sun

What’s Weird and Wonderful?

‘Fauda’ Is Back — and October 7 Changed Everything

AI Threats Are Expected To Figure in Prep Talks for Trump-Xi Summit

White House Turns Away Journalists From CNN, MS NOW and Politico After Trump Ban

With Trump’s Greenland Deal, Arctic Arms Race Looks Set To Heat Up

Pentagon Releases New UFO Files as Whistleblowers Urge Trump To Lift Disclosure Restrictions

The Bittersweet Sound of the Dominican Republic

Paramount-Warner Bros. Merger Nears Settlement as California Exit Threat Looms

More from the New York Sun

What’s Weird and Wonderful?

‘Fauda’ Is Back — and October 7 Changed Everything

AI Threats Are Expected To Figure in Prep Talks for Trump-Xi Summit

White House Turns Away Journalists From CNN, MS NOW and Politico After Trump Ban

With Trump’s Greenland Deal, Arctic Arms Race Looks Set To Heat Up

Pentagon Releases New UFO Files as Whistleblowers Urge Trump To Lift Disclosure Restrictions

The Bittersweet Sound of the Dominican Republic

Paramount-Warner Bros. Merger Nears Settlement as California Exit Threat Looms