
‘Catholics Need Not Apply’: Supreme Court Hears Case Over Colorado’s LGBTQ Rules
By LUKE FUNK
|In a caution for Trump, it seems that the Nine has little appetite for political disputes over the fairness of the voting.

The Supreme Court’s refusal to back President Trump’s effort to ensure the integrity of California’s voting is a moment to mark. The high court rejected a White House request that Los Angeles County set aside some 20,000 mail-in ballots. It reminds that the Constitution ordains that states play the primary role in regulating elections. And, in a caution for Mr. Trump, that the Nine has scant appetite for political disputes over the fairness of the midterm vote.

By LUKE FUNK
|
By ALEX ZDAN
|
By MATTHEW RICE
|
By BRADLEY CORTRIGHT
|
By GEORGE WILLIS
|
By JOSEPH CURL
|
By A.R. HOFFMAN
|
By LUKE FUNK
|The Supreme Court’s refusal to back President Trump’s effort to ensure the integrity of California’s voting is a moment to mark. The high court rejected a White House request that Los Angeles County set aside some 20,000 mail-in ballots. It reminds that the Constitution ordains that states play the primary role in regulating elections. And, in a caution for Mr. Trump, that the Nine has scant appetite for political disputes over the fairness of the midterm vote.
Already have a subscription? Sign in to continue reading
Cancel anytime
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
Cancel anytime