The Debate Roiling the Right Over Conservatism’s Meaning

For the second time in the Trump presidency, the right is debating the concept of the common good and how that concept fits within the American political tradition.During President Trump’s first term, the “common good” debate raged because the unorthodox president’s nationalist instincts and policy prescriptions on issues such as trade and immigration clashed with the more globalist preferences of the Republican Party establishment. The debate is now raging once again, it seems, because Vice President Vance, the odds-on favorite to become the 2028 GOP presidential nominee, is seen as sympathetic to what might be called “common good conservatism” or “post-liberalism.”And that impression of Mr. Vance is correct. I would know, because I have long traveled in many of these same circles. I weighed in heavily during these debates the first time around, even proposing a novel theory of constitutional interpretation called “common good originalism.”Gilbert Stuart’s portrait of James Madison, detail. Via Wikimedia CommonsThis second round of the “common good” debate, though, has been less than edifying. On the anti-“common good” side, there have been way too many intellectual arsonists razing fields of straw men of their own making. And on the pro-“common good” side, there has been way too much inane trolling and stupid, low-IQ slop.It is time to set the record straight about the common good. And the most obvious starting place is this: The common good is emphatically part of the American political tradition.The Constitution’s Framers explicitly identified the common good as the very reason for the charter’s existence: The Preamble simply refers to the identical concepts of a “more perfect Union” and the “general Welfare.” In 57 Federalist, James Madison wrote that the “aim of every political constitution” should be the cultivation and elevation of “men who possess most wisdom to discern, and most virtue to pursue, the common good of the society.”The common good refers to a collectively held good that is attainable only when the political entity’s citizens flourish in harmony with one another. It is a collective good that is greater than the sum of its parts. In politics, it is an aspirational goal — a statesman’s lodestar. Plato and Aristotle spoke of the common good. So too, for that matter, did the Bible. As God said to the Israelites assembled at Mount Sinai, “You shall be to Me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.”Unfortunately, the current idiotic discourse on the common good is doing a disservice to an important debate.Many of the loudest conservative critics of the common good see in its invocation a rejection of individual liberty. But that’s a false choice. The Framers cherished liberty and saw it as one of the most important components of the common good. It’s just that there are other components too, like order and virtue. Some of the common good critics imagine the common good-ers to be closet monarchists or statists. That, too, is rubbish: Madison, who more than anyone else was the father of our non-monarchist and non-statist Constitution, described the common good as the document’s very “aim.”On the other hand, some of the common good’s purported champions have turned out to be their very worst enemies. On X, some ostensible common good-ers have clamored, especially in light of the recent migrant invasion of Spanish exclave Ceuta, for “Franco Friday.” That would be a reference to the 20th-century Spanish dictator, Francisco Franco. General Francisco Franco, the Spanish dictator, in 1930 before the nation’s civil war. Via Wikimedia CommonsNo American should be praising fascism, or any individual fascist, in the name of the “common good” — period. Nor can the “common good” justify whitewashing antisemitism or any other sort of overt discrimination.The most frustrating part of this online slop-fest is that there is a real debate to be had here.In trade policy, America has in recent decades veered too far on the side of globalism and consumerism, at the expense of production and supply chain resilience. In immigration policy, America has in recent decades veered too far on the side of openness, at the expense of civic solidarity and cultural cohesion. And in the culture war, America has in recent decades veered too far on the side of amoral, “live and let live”-style permissiveness — from marijuana to surrogacy to transgenderism, and beyond.How to balance individual liberty and dignity with the common good is one of the oldest questions in politics. Here’s the thing: America’s Founding Fathers had it right. They nailed it. Conservatives should recognize that, instead of rewriting the Founding or stanning for dictators.Yet in order to do that, we need a real debate first.Creators.com

The Debate Roiling the Right Over Conservatism’s Meaning

The Debate Roiling the Right Over Conservatism’s Meaning

More from the New York Sun

King Charles Declines To Meet With Jamaican Delegation As Caribbean Nation Petitions for Slavery Reparations

Investigation Launched Into Claims Female Workers Told To Be ‘Invisible’ During Hindu Group’s Eiffel Tower Visit

Lindsay Clancy’s Attorney Asks Trump To Pardon His Client After Mistrial Declared

Maverick Pharaohs and the Egyptian Art of Royal Reinvention

The Man Who Helped Make Marvel a Universe

Democrats’ Left Flank Looks for One Last Upset Win in New Hampshire

Comey, in Bid To Dismiss ‘86 47’ Case, Argues That Blanche Charged Him With the Wrong Crime

Air Force Audits Fallen Airman’s Benefits as Widow Debates Semantics Over Classification of ‘Operation Epic Fury’

More from the New York Sun

King Charles Declines To Meet With Jamaican Delegation As Caribbean Nation Petitions for Slavery Reparations

Investigation Launched Into Claims Female Workers Told To Be ‘Invisible’ During Hindu Group’s Eiffel Tower Visit

Lindsay Clancy’s Attorney Asks Trump To Pardon His Client After Mistrial Declared

Maverick Pharaohs and the Egyptian Art of Royal Reinvention

The Man Who Helped Make Marvel a Universe

Democrats’ Left Flank Looks for One Last Upset Win in New Hampshire

Comey, in Bid To Dismiss ‘86 47’ Case, Argues That Blanche Charged Him With the Wrong Crime

Air Force Audits Fallen Airman’s Benefits as Widow Debates Semantics Over Classification of ‘Operation Epic Fury’